Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jun
8
2015
Supreme Court Limits Criminal Law’s Reach to Social Media Posts; Avoids First Amendment Issue Covington & Burling LLP
Sep
18
2015
Second Circuit Holds that FLSA Settlements Require Court or Department of Labor Approval Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
6
2016
Harassment Policy Alone Not Sufficient To Utilize Title VII Defense Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
Nov
17
2016
Permanent Injunction Issued Holding DOL Amended Persuader Rule Unlawful Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Apr
20
2018
Protecting Executive Compensation at Time of Separation: There is No Such Thing as “Boilerplate” Sherin and Lodgen LLP
Dec
20
2018
How About That? TCPA Class Action Dismissed as Text Promoting Defendant’s App Was Transactional Message–Express Written Consent Not Required Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
13
2020
Has California Opened the Door to Bring Suit Against “Shill” Plaintiffs in Prop 65, ADA and Other Repeat-Plaintiff Litigation? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
16
2021
Recent COA Ruling Highlights Actions That May Result in Inadvertent Commingling of Separate Assets in a Divorce Varnum LLP
Jan
12
2023
More Delays: Appeal Dismissed under Collateral Order Doctrine McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2023
Lifecycle of a Claim, Part IV: Contracting Officer’s Final Decision Blank Rome LLP
Sep
12
2023
Competition Currents | September 2023 Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jul
17
2012
NLRB Attacks Employment At-Will Disclaimers Poyner Spruill LLP
Mar
27
2013
“No More Bets”: Ontario Court of Appeal Dismisses “Floating Ball” Case Dickinson Wright PLLC
Nov
19
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 19, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
30
2015
Use Belt and Suspenders; Backup Anticipation with Obviousness: Dell Inc. v. Elecs. & Telecomms. Research Inst. McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
4
2016
Fourth Circuit Unable to Determine Whether Driving is Essential Function of Traveling Salesperson's Job Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
13
2016
Eleventh Circuit Applies Five-Year Statute of Limitations to SEC Disgorgement Claims Katten
Feb
2
2018
Recent Massachusetts Decision Highlights Importance of Using Precise Remedy Provisions in Mortgages Ballard Spahr LLP
Sep
22
2018
Answering the BIG Question: Did Marks Just Ruin the FCC’s TCPA Reform Efforts? Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
17
2020
Fire Extinguished?: Delaware Court Rules CallFire Platform May be an ATDS—At Least at the Pleadings Stage Troutman Amin, LLP
Sep
26
2022
The US$363 Million Dollar Question: Are Your Ethylene Oxide Emissions a Litigation Target? K&L Gates
Apr
6
2023
Press Pause: De Novo Review Not Always Required for Obviousness McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
7
2024
CLARITY: Critical New TCPA Case Confirms Express Written Consent Cannot Be Obtained In A Recorded Phone Call Under E-SIGN–And I Told You So Troutman Amin, LLP
Nov
8
2011
Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders: Supreme Court Rules Regarding Liability of Secondary Actors Vedder Price
Jan
22
2014
Frivolous Counterclaim Against Minority Owners Leads to Attorney Fee Award Against Majority Owners Faegre Drinker
Jun
8
2014
What’s My Motivation? To Successfully Petition the PTAB, Experts Should Articulate Reasons for Combining References Armstrong Teasdale
Sep
25
2014
The Affordable Care Act — How Did Two Courts Make Opposite Decisions on Tax Subsidies Poyner Spruill LLP
Jan
26
2016
Supreme Court Upholds FERC’s Demand Response Rule, Order No. 745 Bracewell LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins