Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jun
20
2013
Federal District Court Upholds Stark Regulation Ban on Physician-Owned Under Arrangement Service Providers Mintz
Jun
20
2013
Supreme Court Finds Antitrust Scrutiny Applies to Pay-for-Delay Settlements Bracewell LLP
Jun
20
2013
An International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) First: Claimant Allowed to Seek Enforcement of Arbitral Award While Respondent State's Annulment Application is Pending Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jun
20
2013
North Carolina Supreme Court Clarifies Rule Regarding "Initiation of Proceedings" in Context of Malicious Prosecution Claim Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
20
2013
Supreme Court Holds There Is No Free Pass for Pay for Delay Agreements ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jun
20
2013
U.S. International Trade Commission Grants Injunctive Relief on Standard Essential Patent McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
20
2013
Equal Pay Act: Male Employee's Strong Negotiating Skills Not A "Factor Other Than Sex" To Justify Pay Differential Mintz
Jun
20
2013
Counterfeits, Trademark Infringement, and Contributory Liability: Your Vendors are Your Problem Mintz
Jun
19
2013
Versata: The Double Secret “Technical Effect” Standard Strikes Again Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
19
2013
Employers May Come Up, Um, Short Under Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
19
2013
Appellate Court Ruling Significantly Increases the Likelihood of New Affordable Housing Requirements in California Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jun
19
2013
Federal Circuit Has Appellate Jurisdiction Even Where Damages, Willfulness Have Not Been Determined McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
19
2013
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB) First Business Method Patent Ruling: Challenges for Software Patent Holders Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
19
2013
U.S. Supreme Court Rules That ‘Reverse Payments’ in Hatch-Waxman Litigation Settlement Agreements Must Be Scrutinized Under Antitrust Laws Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jun
19
2013
General Release Of Claims Enforced Against Former 7-Eleven Franchisees Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
19
2013
Bright Lights Not a Significant Impact; Lack of Parking May Be Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
19
2013
More About Trademark Surnames: The Borghese Dispute Mintz
Jun
19
2013
Seventh Circuit Makes Damages More Available for Employees Given Wrong Information About Benefits McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
19
2013
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Antitrust Case Leaving Uncertainty Regarding Customer Loyalty Programs Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
19
2013
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Proposes Rule for Exchanges and SHOPs Under the Affordable Care Act Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jun
19
2013
WARN Act Considerations for Private Equity Firms Faegre Drinker
Jun
18
2013
EEOC Makes Good On Its Promise To Rekindle Disparate Impact Claims: Files Lawsuits Against Dollar General and BMW Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
18
2013
FTC v. Actavis, Inc.: Supreme Court Rules That Reverse Patent Settlements May Violate Antitrust Laws Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
18
2013
Section 3(d) of the Indian Patents Act – Part II Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
18
2013
Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) First Business Method Patent Ruling: Challenges for Software Patent Holders Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
18
2013
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Sues Performance Food Group for Nationwide Sex Discrimination in Hiring U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Jun
17
2013
Re: Patent claims - Can AMP v. Myriad Revive Diagnostic Method Claims?
Jun
17
2013
Angels at Home to Pay $16,000 to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Suit U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins