Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Aug
30
2021
Trade Secret vs. Patent – a False Dichotomy Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
8
2022
Burden Shifting: California Supreme Court Settles Confusion Over Section 1102.5 Claims Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Apr
13
2023
Agree First or it May Cost You Later Robinson & Cole LLP
Nov
24
2012
Broad Reading of Executory Contract when Trademark License Obligations Are Unfulfilled McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
8
2016
Robert Wood Johnson Surgeon, Dr. Vijay Vaswani, Loses Medical License Indefinitely Stark & Stark
Mar
23
2017
Texas District Court Upholds Hospital’s Policy that Disabled Employees Compete for Vacant Positions Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jul
31
2017
Inequitable Conduct Intent Prong Due to Litigation Misconduct
Mar
30
2018
Ball v. Allied Physicians Group, LLC -- instructive case re submission of future medical damages Armstrong Teasdale
Feb
1
2019
7th Circuit Rules Church’s RLUIPA Claims Against Markham, Illinois Ripe for Review Robinson & Cole LLP
Jun
9
2020
Avoidable Disaster?: Trump Campaign’s Strange Decision to Challenge ATDS Allegations at Pleadings Stage Leads to Marks Being Adopted in D. Minn for the First Time Troutman Amin, LLP
Jun
21
2021
Supreme Court Requires USPTO Director Discretion to Review PTAB Decisions Finnegan
Nov
18
2021
SUED FOR WHAT YOU DON’T SAY: New Text Message Content TCPA Theory Gaining Steam–And its Scary Stuff Troutman Amin, LLP
Apr
13
2022
When Voluntary Redundancy Goes Bad – Precautions for Employers (UK) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
14
2018
Judge Preska dismisses all of NYAG’s claims in RD Legal Funding Ballard Spahr LLP
Jun
6
2012
Pennsylvania Supreme Court: Expert Testimony Violates Admissibility Standard Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Mar
23
2015
House Bill Would Tighten Requirements For Visa Waiver Program; Federal Judge Asked To Consider Sanctions In Ongoing Immigration Litigation Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jul
20
2015
Fifth Circuit Enforces High Rule 9(b) Bar in Affirming Dismissal of Implied Certification Case McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
17
2018
PTO Litigation Report – January 17, 2018 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
30
2019
FDA’s Final Guidance: “Consideration of Uncertainty in Making Benefit-Risk Determinations in Medical Device Premarket Approvals, De Novo Classifications, and Humanitarian Device Exemptions” Faegre Drinker
Feb
16
2020
Hope Springs Eternal: Glasser Plaintiff Seeks Re-Hearing from Eleventh Circuit En Banc Troutman Amin, LLP
Apr
15
2020
Belt Fastener Trade Dress Conveyed as Invalid for Being Functional McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
8
2018
West Virginia Employees Can Keep Guns in their Cars – What Employers Need to Know Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
Jun
10
2024
Federal Court Scraps SEC Private Fund Advisers Rule Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
5
2011
E&O Insurer Prevails on Recission Claim Based upon Insurance Application Misrepresentations Williams Kastner
Dec
24
2013
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Publishes Proposed Rule on Focused Mitigation Strategies to Protect Food against Intentional Adulteration Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
12
2015
North Carolina Appellate Courts Hold Grandfather Mountain Must Pay Property Tax Poyner Spruill LLP
May
26
2015
California Supreme Court Makes It Harder For Prevailing FEHA Defendants To Recover Their Costs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
4
2015
Phigenix, Inc. v. Immunogen, Inc.: Final Written Decision Finding No Claims Found Unpatentable Based On Evidence Of Nonobviousness IPR2014-00676 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins