Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jul
27
2023
CLASS CERTIFICATION DENIED!: Court Says Evidence TCPA Litigator Invited Calls Makes her “Inadequate” to Represent Class Troutman Amin, LLP
May
3
2024
Ninth Circuit Holds Loan Modification Made by Unlicensed Lender Violates State Usury Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
19
2011
Fourth Circuit Lacks Jurisdiction due to the Tax Anti-Injunction Act Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
30
2012
Business Groups Join In Request For EEOC To Pay For Title VII Case Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
18
2014
Illinois Whistleblower Awarded $3 Million Following Jury Trial Proskauer Rose LLP
Nov
1
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 1, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
1
2017
Facebook, et al. v. Skky: Patent Holders Can Evade Covered Business Methods Review by Disclaiming CBM Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
9
2017
NLRB’s Acted More Like “Advocate Than Adjudicator” In Issuing Decision, DC Court of Appeals Concludes Proskauer Rose LLP
Nov
9
2018
Coming Up Short: Court Denies Summary Judgment on ATDS use in TCPA Class Action Due to Evidentiary Shortcomings Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
2
2019
Relief from forfeiture – in the balance Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
24
2020
They’re At it Again: NCLC Submits Brief to Eleventh Circuit Asking it to Undo Glasser and Make TCPA Impossible to Comply With–But Whose Interests Are They Really Protecting? Troutman Amin, LLP
Dec
11
2020
Federal District Court in California Sets Aside October 2020 DOL and USCIS H-1B Regulations Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
May
11
2021
Supreme Court Holds the FTC Act Gives No Authority to Bypass Administrative Cease-and-Desist Orders K&L Gates
Nov
15
2022
Spoliation Series: eDiscovery Sanctions Are Not Limited by the Amount in Controversy; Litigators Must Comply in Good Faith with Discovery Obligations Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Feb
13
2024
Class Action Litigation Newsletter | 4th Quarter 2023 Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Aug
21
2010
SCOTX aka Supreme Court of Texas: What I Did On My Summer Vacation Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jul
21
2015
Washington’s Highest Court Rules Piece Rate Compensation Does Not Satisfy Rest Break Pay Requirement Jackson Lewis P.C.
Nov
6
2015
Third Circuit Follows FCC’s Suit and Expands Definition of “Autodialer" Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
25
2016
Ninth Circuit Neutralizers re: Food Labeling Challenge Keller and Heckman LLP
Aug
30
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 30, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
27
2017
California Court of Appeal Clarifies Wage Statement Requirements for Use of Unique Employee Numbers, Hourly Rates for PTO or Vacation Jackson Lewis P.C.
Apr
9
2018
Can We Fix It? Eighth Circuit Answers: Yes, We Can! Jackson Lewis P.C.
Aug
2
2018
En Banc Federal Circuit: § 145 Appellants Generally Not Liable for PTO Attorneys' Fees McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
7
2019
FCA Defendant Petitions Supreme Court, Argues Statute is Unconstitutional Mintz
Oct
2
2019
In a $1.365 Billion Merger, the Target Company “Blindsided” the Proposed Buyer by Terminating the Merger Agreement and the Court Upheld the Termination; Court Requests Further Briefing Re the $126.5 Million Reverse Termination Fee K&L Gates
Dec
9
2019
NY Judge Denies Class Certification in ‘No Artificial Flavors’ Lawsuit Keller and Heckman LLP
Jun
15
2020
The Story of Hannah and Bob – Why Employers Cannot Discriminate Against LGBT Employees Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
30
2020
Chancery Court Clarifies MFW Protections Must Be Implemented Prior To Any Substantive Economic Negotiations K&L Gates
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins