Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jun
17
2014
Buzzsaw or SawStop: Are You Prepared to Avoid Antitrust Liability in the Product Safety Arena? Mintz
Jun
17
2014
Make-Up Art Cosmetics’ Motion for Summary Judgment Granted: Z Produx, Inc. v. Make-Up Art Cosmetics, Inc. Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
17
2014
Online Service Providers (OSPs): Are You Sure You Are Safely Within the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) Safe Harbor? Mintz
Jun
17
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 17, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
17
2014
Handi Quilter, Inc. and Tacony Corp. v. Bernina International AG: Procedure for Filing Supplemental Evidence Faegre Drinker
Jun
17
2014
Natural Products Eligibility Guidance – Post-Forum Comments
Jun
17
2014
QSC Audio Products, Inc. v. Crest Audio, Inc.: Denying Request to File Motion for Supplemental Information Faegre Drinker
Jun
17
2014
GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc.: Denying Motions to Cross-Examine Declarant Faegre Drinker
Jun
16
2014
Federal Circuit Issues Decision Affirming Obviousness of a Molecule Patent Claim Katten
Jun
16
2014
Google, Inc. v. Unwired Planet, LLC, Denying Petitioner’s Motion to Terminate Faegre Drinker
Jun
16
2014
PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) A Provides Guidance on the Scope of Responsive Briefs Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
16
2014
Apple Inc., Google Inc., and Motorola Mobility LLC v. Arrendi S.A.R.L.: Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Jun
16
2014
Supreme Court Decision May Lead to More False Advertising Claims in Food and Beverage Industry Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
16
2014
Gone Judge – Judge Randall Rader To Resign
Jun
16
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 16, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
13
2014
Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc. v. Genzyme Therapeutic Products Limited Partnership Order Denying Petitioner’s Motions to Compel Additional Discovery Faegre Drinker
Jun
13
2014
California Court Broadly Defines What Information Can Qualify as a Trade Secret Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jun
13
2014
Covidien LP v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Jun
13
2014
Cloning: It’s not what you think – Changes to ANVISA’s (Brazil Health Service Agency) “Clone” Procedure Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
13
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 13, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
13
2014
Novel Copyright Action Involving Webcasting and Geofencing to be Decided in Harrisonburg, Virginia Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
13
2014
Aptwater, Inc. v. Thinkvillage-Kerfoot, LLC, Order Denying Motions to Terminate IPR2014-00132, 00133 Faegre Drinker
Jun
12
2014
Cyanotech Corporation v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Order Addressing the Proper Scope of a Reply Faegre Drinker
Jun
12
2014
AL-KO Kober, LLC v. Lippert Components Manufacturing, Inc., Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Jun
12
2014
Aker Biomarine AS v. Neptune Tech. and BioResources Inc.: Order Granting Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery Faegre Drinker
Jun
12
2014
Carl Zeiss SMT GMBH v. Nikon Corp., Denying Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Strike Faegre Drinker
Jun
12
2014
U.S. Supreme Court Allows Pom Wonderful to Pursue Lanham Act Claims against Coca-Cola Mintz
Jun
12
2014
Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects Expansion of the Inducement Doctrine ArentFox Schiff LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins