Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Dec
2
2015
Federal Circuit Denies Rehearing In Sequenom Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
2
2015
Plaintiff with Injured Reputation May Have Standing in Inventorship Correction Case McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
2
2015
A Substantially Pure Isomer Is Obvious When the Completely Pure Isomer Is Known In The Art: Spectrum Pharms., Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
2
2015
Patent Applicant Must Provide Clear Evidence to Antedate a Prior Art Reference In re: Steed et al. McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
US Postal Service and USA, as represented by Postmaster General v. Return Mail: Final Written Decision Finding Standing Based on Eminent Domain Lawsuit CBM2014-00116 Faegre Drinker
Dec
1
2015
Settlement Agreement Precludes Consideration of Order Criticizing Attorney Conduct McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
The Medicines Company v. Hospira, Inc.: Federal Circuit to Consider On-Sale Bar En Banc McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
American Express Company v. Signature Systems, LLC: PTAB Decisions on Instituting CBM Review Are Based Only on the Petition and Preliminary Response McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
Disclaimed Claims May Be Considered When Determining Eligibility for CBM Review McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
Inter Partes Review – 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) One Year Bar and Exceptions Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
1
2015
PTAB Denies Institution Where Claim Indefiniteness Precludes Application of Prior Art to the Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 1, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
1
2015
Citing PTO’s Intervenor Brief, PTAB Grants Rehearing and Clarifies Scope of Joinder McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
PTAB Finds Claims to Be Directed to Covered Business Method, but Denies Institution Anyway McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
Non-Litigant, You Are Not Needed in This IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2015
Patent Trial and Appeal Board: No Rubber Stamp on Motions to Seal McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2015
Square v. Unwired Planet: Final Written Decision holding that Board’s Authority not limited to Grounds Alleged in Petition IPR2014-01164 Faegre Drinker
Nov
30
2015
In re Allegiance Staffing – Rare “Any Other Established Fact” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
30
2015
Patent Owner’s Disclaimers Results in IPR Institution Denial; Not an Adverse Judgment McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2015
Joinder Motions Do Not Nullify the One-Year Statutory Bar for Petitions McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2015
Hanover Ins. Co. v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.: No Fresh Wrong, No Duty to Defend McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2015
Google Books Is Transformative and Therefore a Fair Use McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2015
Good Technology Software v. MobileIron: Granting in Part Institution Finding Time Bar on Challenge to Parent Application Does Not Bar Challenge to Child Application IPR2015-01090 Faegre Drinker
Nov
30
2015
Eleventh Circuit: District Court Twice “Erred with Respect to Every [Confusion] Factor.” McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 30, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
30
2015
Federal Circuit Panel Rejects ITC Assertion of Authority Over Intangible Articles ClearCorrect Operating, LLC et al. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2015
“Voice of America” Belongs to the U.S. Government McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2015
PNC and SunTrust Bank v. Parus Holdings: Denying Institution Because Patent Ineligible for CBM Review CBM2015-00109; CBM2015-00149 Faegre Drinker
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins