Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Dec
16
2015
Urock Network v. Umberto Sulpasso – Claim Preclusion Rocked Cancellation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
16
2015
Is Your Business Good at Keeping Secrets? Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Dec
16
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 16, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
16
2015
Ford Motor Co v. Paice & Abell Foundation: Final Written Decision Finding Some Claim Challenges Estopped IPR2014-00884 Faegre Drinker
Dec
15
2015
Global Tel*Link Corporation v. Securus Technologies: Instituting Post Grant Review on Obviousness but not Patent-Ineligibility Grounds PGR2015-00013 Faegre Drinker
Dec
15
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 15, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
15
2015
Patent Claim Preambles Post-Alice Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Dec
15
2015
Biosimilar Pre-Marketing Notice Always Required Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
14
2015
FDA Legal and Regulatory – 2015 Year In Review Mintz
Dec
14
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 14, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
14
2015
Merck’s Ezetrol and Patent Term Extension in Israel Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
11
2015
"It Ain't Over Till It's Over" – Photographers Obtain Preliminary Injunction to Halt Infringing Sales of Memorabilia Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
11
2015
Square v. Unwired Planet: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-01165 Faegre Drinker
Dec
11
2015
Florida Federal Court Rules that Apotex Must Give Amgen Notice Upon Biosimilar Licensure Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
11
2015
Exhale…Ninth Circuit Rules Sequence of Yoga Poses Not Copyrightable Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
11
2015
Bungie v. Worlds: Decision Instituting Inter Partes Review of All Challenged Claims IPR2015-01319 Faegre Drinker
Dec
11
2015
Running Shoe Companies Accused of Infringing Sports Apparel Patent Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
11
2015
Keep Off (Patented) Grass Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
11
2015
Role of Previously Considered Prior Art in Deciding to Institute Inter Partes Review Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
11
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 11, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
10
2015
Patents: Tips for Responding to New Grounds of Rejection in Examiner’s Answer Mintz
Dec
10
2015
Legacy Separators v. Halliburton Energy Services: Decision Denying Institution IPR2015-01526 Faegre Drinker
Dec
10
2015
When Prior Terminal Disclaimers Continue to Punish Subsequent Applications: Potential Danger in Filing Overly-Broad Terminal Disclaimer Mintz
Dec
10
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 10, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
10
2015
Interference Statute Does Not Require Diligence For Re-Presenting Claims Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
10
2015
Biologics and Biosimilars Bits and Bytes – December 10, 2015 Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
9
2015
North America Seoul Semiconductor v. Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha and Enplas Corp: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00879 Faegre Drinker
Dec
9
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 9, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins