Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Dec
22
2015
AllSteel v. Dirtt Environmental Solutions: Motion to Stay Reissue Proceedings Denied as Premature IPR2015-01690; IPR2015-01691 Faegre Drinker
Dec
22
2015
Judge Orders Attorneys’ Fees to be Paid in eDekka v. 3balls.com Case Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
22
2015
Par Pharmaceutical v. Horizon Therapeutics: Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2015-01117 Faegre Drinker
Dec
22
2015
SK Innovation Co. v. Celgard: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable Where Nexus For Secondary Considerations Is Not Established IPR2014-00680 Faegre Drinker
Dec
22
2015
Federal Circuit Rules Federal Trademark Statute Ban on Disparaging Marks to Be Unconstitutional Mintz
Dec
22
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 22, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
22
2015
Delicious Look At Cookie Press Patent Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
21
2015
Global Tel*Link Corporation v. Securus Technologies: Final Written Decision Holding that CIP Not Presumed to be Entitled to Earlier Filing Date IPR2014-00824 Faegre Drinker
Dec
18
2015
AIA Review Confirmed Constitutional Armstrong Teasdale
Dec
18
2015
Corning Optical Communications RF v. PPC Broadband: Denying Rehearing of Dismissal of Petitions for Not Naming All Real-Parties-in-Interest IPR2014-00440, 00441, 00736 Faegre Drinker
Dec
18
2015
Latest Options for Fast-Tracking Clean Technology Patent Applications Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
18
2015
Osram Sylvania v. Jam Strait: Final Written Decision Construing “Adapted For” Language in Preamble IPR2014-00703 Faegre Drinker
Dec
18
2015
Apple v. VirnetX: Granting Motion to Submit Supplemental Information on Public Availability of Asserted Reference IPR2015-00810-12, 866, 868, 870-71 Faegre Drinker
Dec
18
2015
MasterCard Intl Inc v. John D’Agostino: Final Written Decision Reaching Different Conclusions than Those in Related Reexamination IPR2014-00544 Faegre Drinker
Dec
18
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 18, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
18
2015
Zero Gravity Inside v. FootBalance System Oy: Denying Request to File Reply to Preliminary Response IPR2015-01769,70 Faegre Drinker
Dec
18
2015
Arisdyne Systems v. Cavitation Tech: Order Advising that Cross-Examination Will Occur Before At Least One Member of the Board IPR2015-00977 Faegre Drinker
Dec
17
2015
Australian Patent Office Provides Patent Eligibility Guidance Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
17
2015
Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB's IPR Decision Invalidating A Pharmaceutical Patent Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
17
2015
When Quirk of Copyright Law Creates Christmas Classic: It’s Wonderful Life and Public Domain Mintz
Dec
17
2015
Smartphone Wars – Supreme Court Awakens: Samsung Files Petition for Certiorari in New Hope to Harmonize Design Patent Law Mintz
Dec
17
2015
Sightsound v. Apple: Institution Decisions Are Not Reviewable By Federal Circuit, But Whether Patent Qualifies As CBM Is Faegre Drinker
Dec
17
2015
Sensus USA v. Certified Measurement: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2015-01439 Faegre Drinker
Dec
16
2015
Patenting “Natural Products” Down-Under Post-Myriad
Dec
16
2015
Federal Circuit Provides Additional Insight into the Scope of Board Institution-Related Decisions That Are Not Appealable Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
16
2015
International Business Machines v. Intellectual Ventures II: Granting Request to Preserve Record Pending Appeal IPR2014-00587, IPR2014-00786 Faegre Drinker
Dec
16
2015
Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics: Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Not Unpatentable IPR2014-01146 Faegre Drinker
Dec
16
2015
Netflix v. Copy Protection: Order Regarding Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel IPR2015-00921 Faegre Drinker
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins