Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Apr
3
2017
ChanBond Avoids Institution of Six Cisco IPR Petitions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
3
2017
No Clear Consensus on Patent Venue During TC Heartland Oral Argument Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
3
2017
PTO Litigation Report – April 3, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
1
2017
Dutch Court Rules in Standard Essential Patent Abuse of Dominance Claim McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
31
2017
Sis-Boom-Bah: U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Cheerleader Uniform Design Elements May Be Eligible for Copyright Protection K&L Gates
Mar
31
2017
No False Advertising Where There Is No Injury or Statements Are Opinions McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
31
2017
PTO Litigation Report – March 31, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
31
2017
Mixed Results: Federal Circuit’s Intervening § 101 Determination Faces PTAB Dissent McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
31
2017
University Trademark Licensing Denial Goes up in Smoke McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
31
2017
Petitions Seeking CBM Review Continue Uphill Battle After Unwired Planet McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
31
2017
In re Google: Co-Pending Litigation Is Not Sufficient Basis to Deny Transfer Motion McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
ABA-IPL Section Proposes Amendments to s. 101 – Too much of a “Good Thing”?
Mar
30
2017
Standard for Inventorship: Five Things Academic Scientists Should Know When Pursuing Their First Patent – Part II of V Mintz
Mar
30
2017
Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of Copyright Protection for Features of Useful Articles Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Mar
30
2017
Octane Fitness Does Not Provide a Set Formula For Determining Whether to Grant Attorney Fees. Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
30
2017
Potential Error in Jury Verdict with Respect to Non-Infringement Is Harmless Where Invalidity Is Affirmed Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
30
2017
ITC Sanctions for “Staggering” Destruction of Evidence Upheld McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
No Common Law “Public Performance Right” for Broadcast of Pre-1972 Recordings McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
Downloading Pirated Software Without Installing It May Constitute Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
Personal Web Technologies v. Apple: Obviousness Does Not Speak for Itself McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
Incorporation by Reference Used to Arrive at BRI Claim Construction McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
Why You Should Use USPTO’s Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form Mintz
Mar
30
2017
Factual Findings Required to Show “Apparent Reason to Combine” in Patent Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
Federal Circuit Evaluates PTAB Reliance on Expert Testimony to Satisfy Substantial Evidence McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
PTO Litigation Report – March 30, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
29
2017
Will 30 Years Of Practice Be Overturned? Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument In TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods. Mintz
Mar
29
2017
Janssen v. Celltrion, Damages: “Patent Dance” May Determine Availability of Lost Profits Mintz
Mar
29
2017
Metalcraft of Mayville v. The Toro: Appellate Court Mows Down Objections to Preliminary Injunction McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins