Skip to main content
June 23, 2025
Volume XV, Number 174
Legal Analysis. Expertly Written. Quickly Found.
Login
Publish / Advertise
Publish
Advertise
Publishing Firms
NLR Newsletters
Contact Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Search
About
Contact Us
NLR Team
Publishing Firms
NLR Newsletters
NLR Thought Leadership Awards
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
NLR Blog
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Search
Quick Links
Type of Law
Antitrust Law
Artificial Intelligence Law News
Bankruptcy & Restructuring
Biotech, Food & Drug
Business of Law
Construction & Real Estate
Cybersecurity Media & FCC
Election & Legislative
Environmental & Energy
Family Law, Divorce & Custody
Family Offices, Estates & Trusts
Financial, Securities & Banking
Global
Health Care Law
Immigration
Insurance
Intellectual Property Law
Labor & Employment
Litigation
Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
Tax
White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
Legal Educational Events
NLR Blog
Contact Us
Search
Newsletters
All NLR Newsletters
AI & the Law Newsletter
NLR Career Center for Employers
NLR Career Center for Job Seekers
Trending
Most Recent
Type of Law
Antitrust, Mergers & Acquisitions, Trade
Artificial Intelligence Law News
Bankruptcy & Restructuring
Biotech, Cannabis, Food & Drug
Business of Law, Legal Marketing
Construction & Real Estate
Crime, Civil & Consumer Rights
Cybersecurity, Privacy, Media, & FCC
Election & Legislative
Environmental & Energy
Family Office World
Family Law, Divorce & Custody
Financial, SEC, Corporate, Banking
Global Law Updates
Government Contracting, Public Svc
Health Care Law
Immigration
Insurance
Intellectual Property Law
Labor & Employment
Litigation
Tax Law
Legal Educational Events
NLR Blog
Search
Career Center
Press Releases
GlobeNewswire Press Releases
NLR Press Releases
ACCESS Newswire
CLE
Knowledge Group
Upcoming CLE
CLE Calendar
Trending News
What Regulated Businesses Should Know About the Supreme Court’s Recent NEPA Decision
NEW ATDS BATTLEGROUND: Texas Passes HUGE NEW AMENDMENT to Its State Telemarketing Law Reviving The Risk of Autodialer Cases
Supreme Court Eliminates Heightened Discrimination Standard Under Title VII
Cleaning the Cupboard—Six More Decisions in One Day, and a Largely Harmonious Court - SCOTUS Today
U.S. Supreme Court Holds Majority-Group Plaintiffs Are Not Subject to a Heightened Evidentiary Standard Under Title VII
Supreme Court Clarifies Title VII Evidentiary Standards in “Reverse Discrimination” Cases, Removing Heightened Standard
“Supreme Court Shakes Things Up: Reversal of the ‘Background Circumstances’ Rule Marks Major Legal Shift”
SCOTUS Levels the Field for “Reverse” Discrimination: Potential Consequences
Supreme Court Invalidates "Background Circumstances" Rule in Title VII Cases
SCOTUS Unanimously Holds One Standard for Discrimination Cases Under Title VII
Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
Published between:
Min
Max
Title
Apply
Published
Title
Organization
Oct
6
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 6, 2017
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
6
2017
Federal Circuit’s Aqua Products Decision Clarifies Burden on IPR Petitioner to Challenge Amended Claims
Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
5
2017
Sea Change in IPR or Just an SOS? – Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal
Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
5
2017
AQUA PRODUCTS: The Federal Circuit Shifts The Burden of Proof On Amending Claims During An IPR From The Patent Owner To The Petitioner
Mintz
Oct
5
2017
Beyond Mere Consent: It's All in the Details
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
5
2017
Notice of Appeal Divests PTAB of Jurisdiction
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
5
2017
Assignor Estoppel Is Not a Defense in IPR
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
5
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 5, 2017
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
5
2017
Petitioners Bear the Burden of Proving Invalidity of Amended Claims in IPR Proceedings
K&L Gates LLP
Oct
4
2017
Federal Circuit Concludes that PTAB Not Justified in Placing Burden of Persuasion on Patent Owners When They Seek to Amend Claims in Inter Partes Review
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
4
2017
CAFC Eases Amendment Process In IPR Proceedings
Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
4
2017
The Restasis Patents and Tribal Sovereign Immunity: New Developments
Polsinelli PC
Oct
4
2017
PTO Uses Different Approaches “Configured” to Assess Indefiniteness
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2017
Federal Circuit to Rehear Fee Shifting Decision En Banc
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2017
Government Agencies Have Standing to Petition for CBM Review
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2017
Respondent Has Standing in Appeal from PTAB
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 4, 2017
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
3
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 3, 2017
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
3
2017
Federal Circuit Schools USPTO On Broadest Reasonable Claim Construction
Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
2
2017
Inconsistent PTAB Findings Lead to Error
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2017
Federal Circuit Avoids Addressing Joinder, Questions Expanded Panel Use
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2017
Reliance on Inherency in Obviousness Analysis: Not Cool
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 2, 2017
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
2
2017
IRS Valuation Expert for Michael Jackson Estate Case Almost Thrown Out!
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2017
Federal Circuit Issues Rare Reversal of PTAB IPR Decision Confirming Patent Claims
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2017
PTAB Abused Discretion in Refusal to Consider Late-Breaking Evidence
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2017
PTAB Must Articulate Factual Basis for Obviousness Determination
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2017
Argument for Divided Infringement Goes Off the Rails
McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2017
No Right to a Jury for Award of Attorneys’ Fees
McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2017
No Right to Discovery of Unidentified Patents During BPCIA Litigation
McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2017
Negative Limitations in a Patent Claim – Broad or Narrow?
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
29
2017
AFCP 2.0 and QPIDS Pilot Programs Extended by USTPO
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
29
2017
PTO Litigation Report – September 29, 2017
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
29
2017
Panduit Prevents Apportioning the Profit Pie
McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2017
Recap on Design Patent Drawings
Mintz
Pagination
Previous page
‹‹
Page 60
Next page
››
Subscribe to Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters.
Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters
FB
twt
mast
link
home
Cookies & Privacy