Skip to main content
June 23, 2025
Volume XV, Number 174
Legal Analysis. Expertly Written. Quickly Found.
Login
Publish / Advertise
Publish
Advertise
Publishing Firms
NLR Newsletters
Contact Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Search
About
Contact Us
NLR Team
Publishing Firms
NLR Newsletters
NLR Thought Leadership Awards
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
NLR Blog
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Search
Quick Links
Type of Law
Antitrust Law
Artificial Intelligence Law News
Bankruptcy & Restructuring
Biotech, Food & Drug
Business of Law
Construction & Real Estate
Cybersecurity Media & FCC
Election & Legislative
Environmental & Energy
Family Law, Divorce & Custody
Family Offices, Estates & Trusts
Financial, Securities & Banking
Global
Health Care Law
Immigration
Insurance
Intellectual Property Law
Labor & Employment
Litigation
Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
Tax
White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
Legal Educational Events
NLR Blog
Contact Us
Search
Newsletters
All NLR Newsletters
AI & the Law Newsletter
NLR Career Center for Employers
NLR Career Center for Job Seekers
Trending
Most Recent
Type of Law
Antitrust, Mergers & Acquisitions, Trade
Artificial Intelligence Law News
Bankruptcy & Restructuring
Biotech, Cannabis, Food & Drug
Business of Law, Legal Marketing
Construction & Real Estate
Crime, Civil & Consumer Rights
Cybersecurity, Privacy, Media, & FCC
Election & Legislative
Environmental & Energy
Family Office World
Family Law, Divorce & Custody
Financial, SEC, Corporate, Banking
Global Law Updates
Government Contracting, Public Svc
Health Care Law
Immigration
Insurance
Intellectual Property Law
Labor & Employment
Litigation
Tax Law
Legal Educational Events
NLR Blog
Search
Career Center
Press Releases
GlobeNewswire Press Releases
NLR Press Releases
ACCESS Newswire
CLE
Knowledge Group
Upcoming CLE
CLE Calendar
Trending News
Previous
Changes to Civil Rights Enforcement: New Executive Order Eliminates Disparate-Impact Liability in Federal Regulations
NEW ATDS BATTLEGROUND: Texas Passes HUGE NEW AMENDMENT to Its State Telemarketing Law Reviving The Risk of Autodialer Cases
Supreme Court Eliminates Heightened Discrimination Standard Under Title VII
Cleaning the Cupboard—Six More Decisions in One Day, and a Largely Harmonious Court - SCOTUS Today
U.S. Supreme Court Holds Majority-Group Plaintiffs Are Not Subject to a Heightened Evidentiary Standard Under Title VII
Supreme Court Clarifies Title VII Evidentiary Standards in “Reverse Discrimination” Cases, Removing Heightened Standard
“Supreme Court Shakes Things Up: Reversal of the ‘Background Circumstances’ Rule Marks Major Legal Shift”
SCOTUS Levels the Field for “Reverse” Discrimination: Potential Consequences
Supreme Court Invalidates "Background Circumstances" Rule in Title VII Cases
SCOTUS Unanimously Holds One Standard for Discrimination Cases Under Title VII
Changes to Civil Rights Enforcement: New Executive Order Eliminates Disparate-Impact Liability in Federal Regulations
NEW ATDS BATTLEGROUND: Texas Passes HUGE NEW AMENDMENT to Its State Telemarketing Law Reviving The Risk of Autodialer Cases
Supreme Court Eliminates Heightened Discrimination Standard Under Title VII
Cleaning the Cupboard—Six More Decisions in One Day, and a Largely Harmonious Court - SCOTUS Today
U.S. Supreme Court Holds Majority-Group Plaintiffs Are Not Subject to a Heightened Evidentiary Standard Under Title VII
Supreme Court Clarifies Title VII Evidentiary Standards in “Reverse Discrimination” Cases, Removing Heightened Standard
“Supreme Court Shakes Things Up: Reversal of the ‘Background Circumstances’ Rule Marks Major Legal Shift”
SCOTUS Levels the Field for “Reverse” Discrimination: Potential Consequences
Supreme Court Invalidates "Background Circumstances" Rule in Title VII Cases
SCOTUS Unanimously Holds One Standard for Discrimination Cases Under Title VII
Changes to Civil Rights Enforcement: New Executive Order Eliminates Disparate-Impact Liability in Federal Regulations
Next
Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
Published between:
Min
Max
Title
Apply
Published
Title
Organization
Nov
2
2017
PTO Litigation Report – November 2, 2017
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
1
2017
PTO Litigation Report – November 1, 2017
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
31
2017
Design Patent pto litigation statistics (through OCTOBER 15, 2017) [INFOGRAPHIC]
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
31
2017
Total Profit on the Article as Sold is Alive and Well in Design Patent Litigation
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
31
2017
"Retro" Designs: Using Your Utility Portfolio to Expand Design Protection
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
31
2017
USITC Maintains General Exclusion Order Against Foam Footwear Despite PTO’s Finding of Unpatentability On Reexamination
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
31
2017
Waymo LLC v. Uber Tech: More Bumps in the Road for Uber along the Trade Secret Highway
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2017
General Plastic Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha: Expanded PTAB Panel Explains Exercise of Discretion on Second-Bite Petitions
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 31, 2017
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
31
2017
Arista Networks, Inc. v. International Trade Commission,: Limited Exclusion Order Does Not Require Specific Findings as to Components
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2017
First Data Corp. v. Inselberg: Ownership Dispute Strips Federal Circuit of Jurisdiction to Review
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Gold Standard Instruments v. US Endodontics: Insufficient Teaching Away Throws Cold Water on Heat-Treating Patent
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Intellectual Ventures LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC: Message Received: Direct Infringement of System Claim Requires Evidence of Use
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Failure to Propose Proper Hypothetical Claim Dooms Doctrine of Equivalents: Jang v. Boston Scientific Corp.
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Challenged Claims are Obvious Based on Patent Owners’ Prior Art: Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. v. SFC Co. Ltd.
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Court Extinguishes Parties’ Motions to Strike in LED Patent Dispute
Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
30
2017
Airtight Victory for RV Seal Supplier in Appeal to Overturn Dismissal: Lifetime Indus., Inc. v. Trim-Lok, Inc.
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
PTAB Should Have Given Credit to Inventor Corroborating Evidence: NFC Tech., LLC v. Joseph Matal,
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 30, 2017
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
30
2017
Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Is Not Broadest Possible Interpretation: In re Smith Int’l, Inc.
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Down to the Wire: Patentee Must Rebut Inherent Functionality of Prior Art
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
That’s How the Prima Facie Obviousness Cookie Crumbles
McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
27
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 27, 2017
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
26
2017
PTAB Grants Rare Request for Additional Discovery In IPR
Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
26
2017
Lawsuits Filed on the Same Day Regarding Amgen’s Avastin® Biosimilar
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Oct
26
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 26, 2017
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
26
2017
R&H’s Processes for Preparing Emulsion Polymers with Improved Opacity Not Invalid over the Prior Art that Does Not Include a “Swelling Agent” Narrowly Construed by the PTAB
Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
26
2017
Appeal of Discovery Order in BPCIA Patent Infringement Case Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction and Writ of Mandamus for Compelling Discovery Denied
Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
26
2017
The Seventh Amendment Right to a Jury Trial Does Not Apply to Requests for Attorney’s Fees Under § 285 of the Patent Act
Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
25
2017
CAFC Upheld TTAB’s Decision to Deny Registration of a Mark Merely Descriptive of a Feature of Goods and Services
Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
25
2017
Apple and Samsung Are Headed Back to the Court Room
Mintz
Oct
25
2017
PTAB’s Adoption of Petitioner’s Arguments Regarding Modification of a Prior Art Reference Held Minimally Sufficient to Support its Obviousness Determination
Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
25
2017
Decision on Attorney’s Fees Vacated and Remanded Because the District Court Used an Incorrect Standard and Made Multiple Errors
Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
25
2017
Non-Profit Organization Appellee Described as Representing the Public Interest Not Excluded from Appearing in Court to Defend a PTAB Decision
Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
24
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 24, 2017
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Pagination
Previous page
‹‹
Page 58
Next page
››
Subscribe to Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
+
×
−
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters.
Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters
FB
twt
mast
link
home
Cookies & Privacy