HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
Winghaven Residential Owners Ass'n v. Bridges -- Useful Case for Resisting Large Atty Fees in the Face of a Small Recovery
Wednesday, March 11, 2015

Appellant WingHaven Residential Owners’ Association (“the Association”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered in favor of the Association and against Respondents Paul Bridges and Penny Bridges (“Respondents”). The Association alleges that the trial court erred in awarding only $500 in attorneys’ fees because the Association presented substantial and uncontradicted evidence that it incurred $4,699.50 in reasonable attorneys’ fees, and the trial court offered no explanation as to the reduced award.

AFFIRMED.

Division III holds: Because the Association has failed to establish that the award was a clear abuse of trial court discretion, we affirm.

3/10/2015

Download Winghaven Residential Owners Ass'n v. Bridges

HB Ad Slot
HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins