On March 26, 2021, by means of official letter number SG/UE/230/747/21, by instructions of the President in the exercise of power conferred by article 71, section I of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States; based on the provisions of article 27, section XV of the Organic Federal Public Administration Law, the Bill with Draft Decree amending and adding various provisions to the Hydrocarbons Law (the “Bill”) was sent to the Chamber of Deputies. 

According to President, the Bill aims to promote and save energy, achieve greater production and use efficiency, and secure the supply of hydrocarbons and petroleum products, in order to safeguard national interests and security. The Bill addresses the following:

Minimum Storage of Petroleum Products

The Bill proposes an additional requirement to obtain the permit provided in Chapter I of Title Three of the Hydrocarbons Law¹ (the "Law"), stating that applicants will need to prove before the Energy Regulatory Commission ("CRE") or before the Ministry of Energy ("SENER"), as the case may be, that it has the storage capacity determined by SENER according to the applicable legal provisions.  The provisions referred to in the requirement are those established in the Public Policy for Minimum Storage of Petroleum Products published in the Federal Official Gazette on Dec. 2, 2017, amended by the agreement published on Nov. 29, 2018 (the "Storage Policy").

Denial by Default in Permit Processing Procedure

The "afirmativa ficta" (acceptance by default) provided in Article 52 of the Law is eliminated; instead, in case the authority does not respond to an assignment permit request, the "negativa ficta" (denial by default) will apply.

Revocation of Permits in the Event of Repeated Non-Compliance with Various Provisions Applicable to Hydrocarbons and Petroleum Products

Proposal to add a cause for revocation of permits through the Bill when repetition of the conduct indicated in paragraphs a) and h) of section II of article 86 of the Law² occur.
Fuel Trafficking

• The current basis for revocation of a permit set forth in Article 56, Section XI, related to hydrocarbons, petroleum products or petrochemicals acquired illegally, is amended to add the trafficking of such products.

Suspension of Permits Due to Imminent Danger to National Security, Energy Security or the National Economy

In addition to the SENER and CRE’s powers to temporarily occupy or intervene in the permit holders’ facilities to safeguard the national interest, the Bill adds the power to suspend the activities of permit holders. For the continuation of activities covered by the suspended permit, the authority may contract State production companies for the management and control of the suspended facilities.

The SENER and CRE are granted the power to suspend permits when an imminent danger to national security, energy security, or the national economy is foreseen, including the authority to take over the management and operation of the licensee, for the continuation of activities covered by the permit.

The following chart compares the articles subject to amendments and additions proposed in the Bill:

 The Third Transitory Article of the Bill states that permit holders that could be affected may request, within the framework of the corresponding regulations, payment of corresponding damages.

This provision is logical only if interpreted as referring to permit holders that could be affected by the legal consequences of the Decree approved in terms of the Bill. Since it cannot refer to unlawful acts, the payment referred to in this transitory article cannot be understood as a damage indemnity. Nor can this transitory article refer acts as provided in the Expropriation Law, since such acts would have to be preceded by a declaration of public utility issued by the Federal Executive.

The Fourth Transitory Article establishes that the competent authority will revoke the permits that, by the date the Decree becomes effective³, do not comply with the storage requirements⁴ determined by the Ministry of Energy in accordance with the applicable legal provisions.

Failure to comply with the Storage Policy is not classified in the Law as a reason to revoke the permit, although the permit itself could include such failure as a cause for revocation.

If the permits that, as of the date of entry of the Decree proposed in the Bill, are not revocable for non-compliance with the Storage Policy, they must be subject to an individual analysis to determine whether the revocation is appropriate.

Likewise, according to the provisions of the Sixth Transitory Article, as of the effective date of the Decree, permits that do not comply with the corresponding requirements and violate the provisions of the Hydrocarbons Law will be revoked.

In this regard, it should be considered that only non-compliance or infractions typified in the Law as such constitute grounds for revocation of a permit.

If the Bill is approved, affected individuals could potentially exercise suitable defense means to protect their rights according to their particular situation, to forestall the effects of the Hydrocarbons Law amendment and seek its annulment, either through national or international proceedings.

¹ This chapter regulates the permits granted by SENER for oil treatment and refining, natural gas processing, export and import of hydrocarbons and petroleum products, and the permits granted by the CRE for the transportation, storage, distribution, compression, liquefaction, decompression, regasification, commercialization and sale to the public of hydrocarbons, petroleum products or petrochemicals, and the management of integrated systems.

² Section II of Article 86 establishes the conduct that constitutes violations of the permits granted by the CRE. Such conduct is grouped in 10 subsections, listed from (a) to (j). According to the amendment proposed in the Decree, repetition of the first eight kinds of conduct, typified as violations, will cause the revocation of the permit. Repeated conduct that does not cause revocation of the permit is: the performance of regulated activities without a permit (item i) and any other violation to the third title of the Law and its regulatory provisions, as well as to the regulations, guidelines and administrative provisions under the jurisdiction of the CRE, when such violations are not included in the cases described in the first 8 items of section II of article 86.

³ The day after its publication in the Federal Official Gazette.

⁴ This requirement refers to the SENER's Storage Policy.