Skip to main content

Guidance on how not to respond to discovery requests and orders

Guidance on how not to respond to discovery requests and orders
Wednesday, October 3, 2012

On September 25, the Eastern District of Missouri struck pleadings against a litigant who (a) failed to produce a laptop, claiming it could not be found, until the very last minute; (b) refused to turn over privileged documents or a privilege log for documents withheld from that laptop; and (c) had already destroyed other discoverable information, such as cell phone records. 

District Judge Rodney Sippel's not-too-friendly order was entered in St. Louis Produce Market v. Hughes, Case No. , 4:09CV1912, 2012 WL 4378194 (E.D. Mo. Sep. 25, 2012).

© Copyright 2024 Armstrong Teasdale LLP. All rights reserved