HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
HTML Embed Code
HB Ad Slot
The French Anti-Corruption Agency Takes a Stance to Apply Sapin II Standards to Companies Subject to the CSRD
Thursday, October 17, 2024

On 16 October 2024, the French Anti-Corruption Agency (AFA)[1] published guidance intended to help entities, subject to the Corporate Reporting Sustainability Directive (CSRD)[2], report on their antibribery and corruption (ABC) compliance program.

Under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)[3] G1 – Business conduct and ESRS 2 requirements, companies are required to report on their ABC compliance program. However, a lot of companies subject to CSRD are not yet subject to any ABC legislation.

The AFA explains that this guidance was designed to support companies that do not meet the French Sapin II law[4] thresholds to progressively implement tailored compliance measures. In other words, the AFA considers that the reporting standards set out by the CSRD trigger an obligation to effectively implement an ABC program compliant with the Sapin II requirements. The AFA’s position is even broader since it published a statement indicating that:

Companies that have not voluntarily developed measures to prevent and detect corruption will have to indicate this and demonstrate their willingness to do so. The AFA therefore considers that it is in the best interests of these companies to progressively equip themselves with anti-corruption measures, as this will bring them many benefits.”

Therefore, the AFA has indicated that companies should report the absence of an ABC program and indicate whether and when they will implement such measures.

The AFA comments on the 8 ABC pillars required by the Sapin II Law to set out the interoperability with the CSRD reporting.

ABC Measures required by Sapin II Law CSRD disclosure requirements
Management commitment G1-3: System to prevent and detect corruption
G1-3: Corporate communication on ABC policies
Documented risk mapping updated from time to time

G1-1: Mechanism for identifying and reporting breaches of the code of conduct
G1-3 :

  • Description of company functions most exposed to the risk of corruption.
  • Systems to prevent and detect corruption.
  • Corporate communication on anti-corruption policies.
A code of conduct G1-1: Mechanism for identifying and reporting breaches of the code of conduct
G1-3: Corporate communication on anti-corruption policies
Training specific anti-corruption risks

G1-1: Mechanism for identifying and reporting breaches of the code of conduct
G1-3:

  • Description of company functions most exposed to the risk of corruption.
  • System in place to prevent and detect orruption.
  • Anticorruption training.
  • Corporate communication on anti-corruption policies.

AFA recommends reporting on:

  • Nature, content and depth of training offered or required by the company.
  • Percentage of risk functions covered by training courses.
  • Extent to which training is provided for members of administrative, management and supervisory bodies.
Third-party due diligence

G1-1: Mechanism for identifying and reporting breaches of the code of conduct
G1-3 :

  • Systems to prevent and detect corruption.
  • Anticorruption training.
  • Corporate communication on anti-corruption policies.

G1-4: Information whose publication is optional – proven cases of corruption

An internal whistleblowing system as well as effective protection of whistleblowers

G1-1: Mechanism for identifying and reporting breaches of the code of conduct
G1-3 :

  • Systems to prevent and detect corruption.
  • Systems for investigating and responding to allegations or cases of corruption.
  • Corporate communication on anti-corruption policies.

G1-4: Information whose publication is optional – proven cases of corruption

An internal control and evaluation system for the measures implemented G1-1: Mechanism for identifying and reporting breaches of the code of conduct
G1-3 : Corporate communication on anti-corruption policies
Internal and external accounting control procedures G1-1: Mechanism for identifying and reporting breaches of the code of conduct
G1-3: Corporate communication on anti-corruption policies
A disciplinary regime enabling accountability for breaches of the company’s code of conduct by employees

G1-1 :

  • Mechanism for identifying and reporting breaches of the code of conduct.

G1-3 :

  • Systems for investigating and responding to allegations or cases of corruption. AFA recommends separating investigators, investigation committees and the relevant management chains, and providing a procedure for communicating results to the relevant administrative, management and supervisory bodies.
  • Corporate communication on anti-corruption policies.

G1-4: Information whose publication is optional – proven cases of corruption

AFA recommends reporting on:

  • Total number and nature of confirmed cases.
  • Numbers of cases resulting in the dismissal or punishment of workers.
  • Numbers of contracts terminated or not renewed with business partners due to corruption-related offences.
  • Details of public legal proceedings initiated against the company and its employees for corruption during the reference period, and details of the outcome of these proceedings.
  • Proceedings initiated in previous years, the outcome of which was not known until the reference period in question.

 

Although the position taken by the AFA vis-à-vis corporates not subject to Sapin II is challengeable, the interoperability between ABC compliance measures and ESG reporting obligations is likely to simplify the reporting workstream and is cost-efficient (i.e., positive impact on the governance, time savings (on data collection and transcription) and data reliability, as the AFA underlines it).

Finally, this should facilitate third party due diligence and provide visibility to investors in corporate transactions.


[1] The AFA provides advice, assistance and has administrative powers of control enabling it to verify the reality and effectiveness of ABC mechanisms implemented by entities subject to Sapin II Law.

[2] Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of December 14, 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (CSRD – Corporate sustainability reporting directive).

[3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202302772. Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The information included in the sustainability report should comply with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (“ESRS”) and include (1) the methodology to be adopted as part of the double materiality analysis; (2) the mandatory information that must be reported under the CSRD; (3) the data collection methodology; (4) the preparation of the sustainability report; and (5) the follow-up and updating of the sustainability report.

[4] Law 2016-1691 of December 9, 2016 on transparency, the fight against corruption and the modernization of economic life. Thresholds are as follows: companies with 500 employees, whose turnover or consolidated turnover exceeds €100 million having its registered office based in France

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins