HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
Brown v. Seven Trails Investors, LLC -- Instructive Opinion Considering a "Battle of the Experts" and Summary Judgment
Wednesday, December 10, 2014

Unfortunately, "battle of the experts" is not a revamped iteration of the American Gladiator series. Instead, this case addresses the role of expert opinions in establishing a prima facie case for summary judgment, as well as in demonstrating a genuine issue of material fact.   Additionally, it provides a thorough examination of causation facts in a toxic substance tort case (mold and spider bite).  

Court Summary:

Shannon Brown (Plaintiff), as successor personal representative for the estate of Daniel Kruse and personal representative for the estate of Sharon Kruse, appeals the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment for Seven Trails Investors, LLC and Madison Apartment Group, LP (Defendants) on Plaintiff’s claims of negligence, nuisance, res ipsa, and gross negligence. In her sole point relied on, Plaintiff claims that the circuit court’s summary judgment order is erroneous because Plaintiff presented evidence demonstrating the existence of a material factual dispute in that: (1) this “battle of the experts” is not a proper forum for summary judgment; (2) Plaintiff presented expert testimony to rebut Defendants’ motion; (3) this matter is subject to the “sudden onset doctrine;” and (4) the nuisance claim does not require medical testimony.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

Division Four Holds:

Plaintiff cites no authority to support the claim that summary judgment is not permitted if the evidence adduced involves a “battle of the experts” and we deem this claim abandoned. The sudden onset rule is not applicable and expert medical testimony is necessary to establish causation as to Plaintiff’s claims, including Plaintiff’s nuisance claim. Plaintiff demonstrated a genuine issue of material fact with respect to whether the mold caused the injuries, but not with respect to whether the spider bite caused Daniel Kruse’s wound. Accordingly, the circuit court erred by granting Defendants summary judgment as to claims related to the mold, but did not err by granting Defendants summary judgment as to claims related to the spider bite.

Download Brown v. Seven Trails Investors, LLC

HB Ad Slot
HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins