UCC

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which was initially introduced in 1952, is one of the uniform acts which have been put into law, to govern the purchase/sale agreements in the United States and internationally, dealing with commercial transactions and other business dealings. All 50 states have adopted the UCC, the District of Columbia, and U.S Territories have also adopted the acts, in an attempt to better manage commercial transactions in the country.

The National Law Review features news, stories, and legal information dealing with commercial transactions and contracts which are entered into, by parties agreeing to terms laid out in the UCC. News coverage on the site includes topics for both individuals and business entities, who are doing business outside of their home state. The UCC is effective when individuals and businesses, from different states, intend to do business or contract to do business, across state borders. The National Law Review covers the latest stories and transactions, and litigation, which deals with terms of sale, contract terms, and parties who don’t comply with contract terms, as they are laid out by the Uniform Code.

Breach of confidentiality, breach of contract terms, implied warranty of merchantability, materiality provisions, indemnification terms, insurance, products liability, requirements contracts, clickwrap agreements, deposit account control agreements, and other news, stories, and litigation, related to the UCC, are covered by the National Law Review. Visitors can also read about topics such as duty of care owed by contracting parties, contractual limitations imposed on parties, lessee's rights and duties, buyer’s remedies and obligations, and other terms which are specific to commercial transactions, by parties that are bound by the Uniform Commercial Code based upon the type of goods/services, and the amount in question.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization
Oct
28
2013
Government Procurement: September and October 2013 Federal Register Update Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
24
2013
Offices of Inspector General (OIG) Investigations (Without Subpoena Bells and Whistles) Coming to a Program Near You Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
23
2013
Covenants Not To Compete – Fourth District of CA Considers A New Fine Question (Or Two) Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Oct
23
2013
JCPenney and Martha Stewart's Marriage will be Cut Short McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
Oct
22
2013
Coast-to-Coast Noncompete Dispute Highlights 3 Key Enforcement Strategies Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
22
2013
Non-Compete Agreements: Lessons from Illinois Courts Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Oct
21
2013
After the Shutdown Ends: Getting Back on Track Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.
Oct
18
2013
Sonic Calabasas Is A Tactical Retreat From Supreme Court Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) Precedent Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
17
2013
Following Recent Maryland Ruling, Federal Court Declares New Jersey Scheme to Promote Investment in In-State Generation Unconstitutional McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
16
2013
Supreme Court Will Not Review Therasense Standards – Yet Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
16
2013
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Affirms Validity of Late-Recorded Variance Beveridge & Diamond PC
Oct
11
2013
Court Of Appeal Holds Breach Of Fiduciary And Conflict Of Interest May Be Grounds For Summary Election Challenge Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Oct
11
2013
Focus On Restrictive Covenants: Illinois Supreme Court Rejects Petition for Leave to Appeal in Fifield Vedder Price
Oct
10
2013
Shift in Minnesota’s Law on Indemnification in Construction Contracts Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
10
2013
Georgia’s Tort Apportionment Statute Does Not Abolish Contribution Claims by Contractor against Architect Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
9
2013
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Enforces a Negotiated Limitation of Liability Provision Consistent With Indiana Law Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
8
2013
Fifield Appeal Denied – New Rule Regarding Consideration for Restrictive Covenants in Illinois Survives Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
7
2013
Westburg Decision Provides Strong Lever for Lenders von Briesen & Roper, s.c.
Oct
4
2013
Federal Court Orders Tuomey to Pay $237 Million for Violations of the Stark Law and False Claims Act Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
4
2013
The False Claims Act is Not a License to Divulge Employer Confidences Mintz
Oct
3
2013
Will Issuers Add SEC Rule 506(d) Bad Acts To The Definition Of “Cause”? Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Oct
3
2013
Important Virginia Supreme Court Employment Law Decision Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.
Oct
2
2013
The Forum-Selection Clause in Your Franchise Agreement: Why it’s Important Armstrong Teasdale
Oct
2
2013
The North Carolina Supreme Court: Metrics for 2013 Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
27
2013
Robert Frost and Cybersecurity - Two Roads Diverging Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
27
2013
No More Playing Cute With Non-Solicitation Obligations: First Circuit Court of Appeals Rejects "Customer Called Me First" Argument Mintz
Sep
27
2013
Details: Highlights from the August & September 2013 Federal Register Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
27
2013
Canada's First Foreign Bribery Conviction Shows Trend in Increased Enforcement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
24
2013
Are You Compliant? New Public Records Act Impacts Government Contractors in Florida Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Sep
23
2013
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) New Rules Target Veterans and Individuals with Disabilities Faegre Drinker
Sep
23
2013
Buy-Sell Agreements Re: Businesses Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.
Sep
16
2013
Massachusetts Governor Would Like to Join California As a Non-Noncompete State Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
14
2013
Summary Judgment For Assignee of Note and Guaranty Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
13
2013
California Requires New Online Disclosures: Specifics Unclear Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
11
2013
When Is a Non-Binding Term Sheet or Letter of Intent Enforced as a Binding Contract? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins