Litigation Trial Practice

Published between:
Published Title Organization
May
13
2015
 Delaware Lowers the Boom on Energy MLP Boards IMS Legal Strategies
May
13
2015
 Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of ERISA Stock Drop Claims Proskauer Rose LLP
May
13
2015
 PTO Litigation Center Report – May 13, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
13
2015
 Facebook is Not a Picket Line McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
May
13
2015
 Jefferson County: State Rate Setting Authority vs. The Bankruptcy Code Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
12
2015
 Is Your Expert Analysis Protected by the Attorney-Client Privilege? Jackson Lewis P.C.
May
12
2015
 California Supreme Court Delineates a Structured Rule of Reason Analysis for Evaluating Reverse Payment or Pay-for-Delay Settlements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
12
2015
 D.C. Circuit Says “Heads I Win, Tails You Lose” Is Maybe Not the Best Set of Rules for Criminal Forfeiture Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP
May
12
2015
 Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corporation: Denying Institution IPR2014-01515 Faegre Drinker
May
12
2015
 Wavemarket Inc. d/b/a Location Labs v. LocatioNet Systems: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00199 Faegre Drinker
May
12
2015
 PTO Litigation Center Report – May 12, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
12
2015
 Collective Consultation Obligations: Restoring the “Establishment” Test in UK Employment Law Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
May
12
2015
 False Claims Act Retaliation Decision Underscores Broad Scope of FCA Whistleblower Protection Zuckerman Law
May
12
2015
 Daifuku Co., Ltd. and Daifuku America Corp. v. Murata Machinery, Ltd.: Denying Institution IPR2015-00084,87 Faegre Drinker
May
12
2015
 California Supreme Court Scrutinizes Reverse Payment ANDA Settlements Foley & Lardner LLP
May
12
2015
 Scott Ford Discusses the Importance of Understanding a Client’s Business Objective when Determining the Appropriate Strategy to Resolve a Dispute. Mintz
May
12
2015
 Whistleblower Obtains $80,000 in Punitive Damages Zuckerman Law
May
12
2015
 Edmund Optics, Inc. v. Semrock, Inc., Granting Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2014-00599 Faegre Drinker
May
11
2015
 Samsung Electronics v. Smartflash LLC: Denying Leave to File Motion to Compel Routine Discovery CBM2014-00190 Faegre Drinker
May
11
2015
 Temporal Power, Ltd. v. Beacon Power, LLC, Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2015-00146 Faegre Drinker
May
11
2015
 New Jersey Appellate Division Decision Establishes Factors for Expelling Members of New Jersey Limited Liability Company Stark & Stark
May
11
2015
 The PTAB Explores Estoppel in New Representative Decision Mintz
May
11
2015
 PTO Litigation Center Report – May 11, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
11
2015
 NLRB Holds Firm on its View that Class/Collective Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements Violate the NLRA Mintz
May
11
2015
 Amarin Pharma Preemptively Sues FDA over First Amendment Rights Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
11
2015
 Different Standards for Self-Critical Analysis Privilege in Illinois: What You Need to Know Foley & Lardner LLP
May
11
2015
 It’s Time To Put A Stop To Fee-Shifting (But Not In the Way You Might Think) Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
May
10
2015
 District Court Dismisses Securities Class Action Against Electronic Arts Katten
May
10
2015
 Autel U.S. and Autel Intelligent Tech v. Bosch Automotive: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00183 Faegre Drinker
May
9
2015
 Class Action Against Outsourcing Firm Alleges Anti-American Employment Bias Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
May
8
2015
 Purdue Pharma v. Depomed: Denying Request for Rehearing Decision on Institution IPR2014-00379 Faegre Drinker
May
8
2015
 Medtronic v. Marital Deduction Trust and Endotach: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00100 Faegre Drinker
May
8
2015
 District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action Against Urban Outfitters Katten
May
8
2015
 Recent Case Illustrates Importance of Careful Plan Drafting Covington & Burling LLP
May
8
2015
 Baker v. Microsoft Corporation Revisited: Video Gaming Company Seeks to Stop Class Action Plaintiffs From Shortcutting the Appeals Process Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Subscribe to Litigation Trial Practice
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters.

 

Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters