Skip to main content
June 18, 2025
Volume XV, Number 169
Legal Analysis. Expertly Written. Quickly Found.
Login
Publish / Advertise
Publish
Advertise
Publishing Firms
NLR Newsletters
Contact Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Search
About
Contact Us
NLR Team
Publishing Firms
NLR Newsletters
NLR Thought Leadership Awards
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
NLR Blog
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Search
Quick Links
Type of Law
Antitrust Law
Artificial Intelligence Law News
Bankruptcy & Restructuring
Biotech, Food & Drug
Business of Law
Construction & Real Estate
Cybersecurity Media & FCC
Election & Legislative
Environmental & Energy
Family Law, Divorce & Custody
Family Offices, Estates & Trusts
Financial, Securities & Banking
Global
Health Care Law
Immigration
Insurance
Intellectual Property Law
Labor & Employment
Litigation
Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
Tax
White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
Legal Educational Events
NLR Blog
Contact Us
Search
Newsletters
All NLR Newsletters
AI & the Law Newsletter
NLR Career Center for Employers
NLR Career Center for Job Seekers
Trending
Most Recent
Type of Law
Antitrust, Mergers & Acquisitions, Trade
Artificial Intelligence Law News
Bankruptcy & Restructuring
Biotech, Cannabis, Food & Drug
Business of Law, Legal Marketing
Construction & Real Estate
Crime, Civil & Consumer Rights
Cybersecurity, Privacy, Media, & FCC
Election & Legislative
Environmental & Energy
Family Office World
Family Law, Divorce & Custody
Financial, SEC, Corporate, Banking
Global Law Updates
Government Contracting, Public Svc
Health Care Law
Immigration
Insurance
Intellectual Property Law
Labor & Employment
Litigation
Tax Law
Legal Educational Events
NLR Blog
Search
Career Center
Press Releases
GlobeNewswire Press Releases
NLR Press Releases
ACCESS Newswire
CLE
Knowledge Group
Upcoming CLE
CLE Calendar
SproutEd
CLE Memberships
CLE Calendar
Trending News
Supreme Court Eliminates Heightened Discrimination Standard Under Title VII
Cleaning the Cupboard—Six More Decisions in One Day, and a Largely Harmonious Court - SCOTUS Today
U.S. Supreme Court Holds Majority-Group Plaintiffs Are Not Subject to a Heightened Evidentiary Standard Under Title VII
Supreme Court Clarifies Title VII Evidentiary Standards in “Reverse Discrimination” Cases, Removing Heightened Standard
“Supreme Court Shakes Things Up: Reversal of the ‘Background Circumstances’ Rule Marks Major Legal Shift”
SCOTUS Levels the Field for “Reverse” Discrimination: Potential Consequences
Supreme Court Invalidates "Background Circumstances" Rule in Title VII Cases
SCOTUS Unanimously Holds One Standard for Discrimination Cases Under Title VII
Changes to Civil Rights Enforcement: New Executive Order Eliminates Disparate-Impact Liability in Federal Regulations
How Are Family Offices Building Smarter Wealth? Structural Alpha (11 Examples)
Litigation Trial Practice
Published between:
Min
Max
Title
Apply
Published
Title
Organization
Dec
2
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 2, 2015
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
2
2015
Proper Claim Construction Requires Context - Atlas IP, LLC v. Medtronic, Inc.
McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
2
2015
Federal Circuit Denies Rehearing In Sequenom
Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
2
2015
Plaintiff with Injured Reputation May Have Standing in Inventorship Correction Case
McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
2
2015
A Substantially Pure Isomer Is Obvious When the Completely Pure Isomer Is Known In The Art: Spectrum Pharms., Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
2
2015
Piercing The Corporate Veil Takes More Than Just Fraud By The Individual
Mintz
Dec
2
2015
Patent Applicant Must Provide Clear Evidence to Antedate a Prior Art Reference In re: Steed et al.
McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
2
2015
Does That Data Really Meta? re: Expert Reports in Litigation
IMS Legal Strategies
Dec
2
2015
Freezing Orders in Royal Jersey Court in Post-Judgment Proceedings
Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered
Dec
2
2015
Professor Coffee and Judge Rakoff Comment on Securities Class Actions
Mintz
Dec
1
2015
Philadelphia Trial Court Rules Familiy Practitioner Cannot Testify
Stark & Stark
Dec
1
2015
Plaintiffs’ Full Refund Theory of Restitution Under California’s Unfair Competition Law Goes Up in Smoke in Latest Tobacco II Opinion
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
1
2015
Deaf Employee Who Was Fired For Positive Drug Test Result Could Not Show Disability Discrimination
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Dec
1
2015
When Same-Sex Marriage Ends, Ex-Spouse May Have Custody Rights
Varnum LLP
Dec
1
2015
US Postal Service and USA, as represented by Postmaster General v. Return Mail: Final Written Decision Finding Standing Based on Eminent Domain Lawsuit CBM2014-00116
Faegre Drinker
Dec
1
2015
Starkey v. G. Adventures—Enforcing Contract Terms
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Dec
1
2015
Settlement Agreement Precludes Consideration of Order Criticizing Attorney Conduct
McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
Non-Compete Agreements and Fraudulent Transfer Law--How Doing Nothing can be Reasonably Equivalent Value in the Tenth Circuit
Holland & Hart LLP
Dec
1
2015
The Medicines Company v. Hospira, Inc.: Federal Circuit to Consider On-Sale Bar En Banc
McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
American Express Company v. Signature Systems, LLC: PTAB Decisions on Instituting CBM Review Are Based Only on the Petition and Preliminary Response
McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
Disclaimed Claims May Be Considered When Determining Eligibility for CBM Review
McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
Inter Partes Review – 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) One Year Bar and Exceptions
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
1
2015
Ninth Circuit Affirms Grant of Summary Judgment to PayPal
Faegre Drinker
Dec
1
2015
PTAB Denies Institution Where Claim Indefiniteness Precludes Application of Prior Art to the Claims
McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
Will Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) and 37(e) Reduce the Scope and Costs of Discovery?
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Dec
1
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 1, 2015
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
1
2015
Citing PTO’s Intervenor Brief, PTAB Grants Rehearing and Clarifies Scope of Joinder
McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
Managers in Australia Beware! – Price of Seniority May be Personal Liability
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
1
2015
PTAB Finds Claims to Be Directed to Covered Business Method, but Denies Institution Anyway
McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
Non-Litigant, You Are Not Needed in This IPR
McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2015
Steep Slope — Vermont Supreme Court Finds AIG Not Unitary With a Ski Resort Based On a Clear and Cogent Evidence Burden of Proof
McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2015
Patent Trial and Appeal Board: No Rubber Stamp on Motions to Seal
McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2015
Square v. Unwired Planet: Final Written Decision holding that Board’s Authority not limited to Grounds Alleged in Petition IPR2014-01164
Faegre Drinker
Nov
30
2015
D.C. Circuit Ruling Yet Another Reminder of NLRB’s Handbook Initiative
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Nov
30
2015
Do You Even Lift, Bro? How Case Of Seemingly Innocent Workplace Bullying Can Blindside Your Company With Title VII Lawsuit
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Pagination
Previous page
‹‹
Page 920
Next page
››
Subscribe to Litigation Trial Practice
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters.
Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters
FB
twt
mast
link
home
Cookies & Privacy