Litigation Trial Practice

Custom text Title Organization
Sep
11
2017
 Will This Term of Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Be the Last for Agency Deference in Wisconsin? Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
11
2017
 In Merger- Related Suit, Attorney-Client Privilege Prevailed Over Garner Challenge K&L Gates
Sep
11
2017
 Student-Athletes Seek $45M in Legal Fees and Costs in NCAA Scholarship Antitrust Lawsuit Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
11
2017
 Overtime Exemption Increases: Not Now, But (Probably) Soon Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
11
2017
 U.S. Supreme Court is Asked to Answer the Question: What Do You Mean by ‘Sex’? Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
11
2017
 Statistical Sampling Stumble – Fourth Circuit Misses Opportunity to Provide False Claims Act Guidance Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Sep
11
2017
 Corporate Tax Residence: Another Chapter Katten
Sep
11
2017
 Iowa Supreme Court Upholds Class Certification in Corn Mill Nuisance Suit Beveridge & Diamond PC
Sep
11
2017
 Chapter 5 - Prohibited Whistleblower Retaliation Under SOX Zuckerman Law
Sep
11
2017
 Texas Supreme Court Upholds $22.7M Award in Gas Production Contamination Case Beveridge & Diamond PC
Sep
11
2017
 "Stick A Fork in It!" Updated Overtime Rules Are DOA . . . For Now Ward and Smith, P.A.
Sep
11
2017
 The FCA’s First-to-File Bar and The Enduring Importance of Textualism Covington & Burling LLP
Sep
11
2017
 New York Municipality Not Immune in Negligent Lead Abatement Suit Beveridge & Diamond PC
Sep
11
2017
 North Carolina Legislature Limits Nuisance Lawsuits, Reducing Potential Liability for Hog Farming Industry Beveridge & Diamond PC
Sep
10
2017
 Kentucky Appeals Court Outlines Limitations on Stigma Damages Beveridge & Diamond PC
Sep
10
2017
 Federal District Court Orders New Trial in Tort Lawsuit Against Natural Gas Producer Beveridge & Diamond PC
Sep
10
2017
 Fifth Circuit: Louisiana’s Subsequent Purchaser Doctrine Bars Claims for Damage to Real Property Beveridge & Diamond PC
Sep
10
2017
 New Jersey Extends “Take-Home” Toxic Tort Liability Beveridge & Diamond PC
Sep
10
2017
 Last product liability claims dismissed in Massachusetts PCB suit Beveridge & Diamond PC
Sep
8
2017
 Indefinite Leave Not A Reasonable Accommodation Under Connecticut Law Murtha Cullina
Sep
8
2017
 Bellefonte’s Influence Continues to Wane Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
8
2017
 Outlet And Factory Class Actions Take A Hit: California Court of Appeal Confirms Companies Can Sell Made-For-Outlet Product At Outlet Or Factory Stores Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
8
2017
 Second Circuit Issues Key Ruling Regarding Personal Benefit Requirement for Insider Trading Liability Katten
Sep
8
2017
 Privacy-Class-Action-Plaintiffs' Emerging Litigation Strategy Avoids Arbitration Polsinelli PC
Sep
8
2017
 PTO Litigation Report – September 8, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
8
2017
 Court Approves $342,500 Settlement On Behalf of 82 Tipped Food Service Workers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
7
2017
 Will the Upsurge in Cat Bonds Weather the Storm(s)? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
7
2017
 California Defendants Beware: Failing to Compel Arbitration Against Named Plaintiff Could Have Far-Reaching Consequences Proskauer Rose LLP
Sep
7
2017
 Mallinckrodt v. Praxair – Innomax Method Patent Fails Alice/Mayo Test Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
7
2017
 The European Court of Justice’s Judgment in Intel Covington & Burling LLP
Sep
7
2017
 Government Agrees to Inform Travelers Denied Entry to U.S. of Right to Reapply for Visas Jackson Lewis P.C.
Sep
7
2017
 NANTKWEST, INC. v. MATAL: Expenses Incurred by Government Attorneys during a 35 U.S.C. § 145 Appeal Can Be Recovered by the USPTO Hunton Andrews Kurth
Sep
7
2017
 NEXLEARN, LLC, v. ALLEN INTERACTIONS, INC.: Contacts with a Forum State that Occurred Prior to the Issuance of a Patent are Not Sufficient to Confer Personal Jurisdiction for a Patent Infringement Case Hunton Andrews Kurth
Sep
7
2017
 Ninth Circuit Confirms that a Cy Pres Only Settlement Can Work In Privacy Class Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
7
2017
 STORER v. CLARK: Enablement from a Provisional Application Must Be Supported by the Disclosure and Not Require Undue Experimentation by a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art Hunton Andrews Kurth
Subscribe to Litigation Trial Practice
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins