Litigation Trial Practice

Published between:
Published Title Organization
Aug
21
2012
7th Circuit: Trademark Owners in Bankruptcy Cannot Revoke License Agreements Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Aug
21
2012
Eighth Circuit Holds That Independent Sales Representative Is Contractor Despite 27-Year Engagement With Company Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
20
2012
Southern District of New York Denies ADA & FMLA Plaintiff’s Motion For Summary Judgment & Instead Grants Summary Judgment For Employer Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
20
2012
With $22.5 Million Google Settlement, FTC Sends a Clear Message Ifrah Law
Aug
20
2012
Defendants File Motion to Dismiss in Indiana Right-to-Work Lawsuit Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
20
2012
An Insurance Fund for Futures Customers on the Horizon? Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. (RIMS)
Aug
19
2012
Qui Tam Relator Not Original Source; U.S. ex rel. Repko v. Guthrie Clinic Mintz
Aug
19
2012
Indiana Plaintiff Defeats Legitimate Nondiscriminatory Reason Defense Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
19
2012
Puyallup Truck Dealership Sued by EEOC for National Origin and Sexual Harassment U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Aug
18
2012
National Right to Work Foundation Files Amicus Brief Challenging President Obama's NLRB Recess Appointments Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
17
2012
Magnetics International to Pay $30,000 To Settle EEOC Religious Discrimination Suit U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Aug
17
2012
The Ninth Circuit finds that the removing defendant met its evidentiary burden by proving the CAFA amount in controversy to a legal certainty Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
17
2012
New Jersey Appellate Court “Renews” Recommendation that Model Jury Charge For Failure-to-Accommodate Cases Is Needed Faegre Drinker
Aug
17
2012
Hawaii Electric Company to Pay $50,000 to Settle EEOC Disability Discrimination Suit U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Aug
16
2012
Judicial Estoppel Bars Flip-Flop Within the Same Case as to Ownership of Patents McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Aug
16
2012
Right Is Simple Hunton Andrews Kurth
Aug
16
2012
A federal district court in Louisiana addresses amount in controversy requirements in holding that a multi-plaintiff case is neither a class action nor a mass action under CAFA Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
16
2012
Recent Fee Shifting Cases Caution Against Diving into Non-Compete/Trade Secret Litigation Where the Facts Supporting a Violation are Unknown or Questionable Faegre Drinker
Aug
16
2012
Proposed Rules for Implementing the First-Inventor-to-File Provisions of the America Invents Act Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
16
2012
Court Catches Unsuspecting Policyholder in Property Insurance Traps Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Aug
16
2012
Another California Court of Appeal Struggles to Come To Grips with Arbitration Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
16
2012
U.S. Attorney and EPA Announce Settlement with City of Fitchburg U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Aug
16
2012
Northern District of Illinois Holds that Plaintiffs’ Proposal of a Consolidated Trial May Trigger Federal Jurisdiction Under CAFA as a Mass Action Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
15
2012
JES/Genie Temps to Pay $80,000 to Settle EEOC Disability Discrimination Suit U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Aug
15
2012
Florida Rules to Address Electronically Stored Information Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
Aug
15
2012
Third Circuit vacates order granting the defendant leave to appeal an order remanding a class action case to state court where post-remand the state court dismissed the case Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
14
2012
Eighth Circuit affirms denial of remand in a case where the plaintiff attempted to challenge the court’s CAFA jurisdiction based on an amended complaint filed after removal Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
14
2012
Halftime Score: Artist 1; ’Bama 0 McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Aug
14
2012
Maximus Will Pay $50,000 to Settle EEOC Disability Discrimination Lawsuit U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Aug
14
2012
Ninth Circuit reverses a remand order where the district court erroneously refused to consider jurisdictional evidence submitted by the removing party Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
13
2012
A Sticky Situation—Secondary Considerations Require NEXUS to the Claimed Invention McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Aug
13
2012
The Seventh Circuit holds that 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(9) relating to securities class actions is an exception to CAFA jurisdiction, not a prerequisite Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
13
2012
The Eighth Circuit holds that stipulations filed contemporaneously with a complaint limiting damages to an amount below CAFA’s jurisdictional threshold may be used to defeat CAFA jurisdiction Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
13
2012
“Clear and Convincing” Is the Standard for Obviousness No Matter What McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Aug
12
2012
Non-Consumer Confusion May Factor into “Likelihood of Confusion” Analysis McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters.

 

Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters