Litigation Trial Practice

Published between:
Published Title Organization
Nov
3
2014
 Agricultural Cooperative Antitrust Litigation Continues to Mushroom Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
3
2014
 California Federal Court Finds Use Of “P” Word Does Not Necessarily A Partnership Make Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Nov
3
2014
 Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's (CAFC) Decision in Victoria’s Secret Case Could Impact Tariff Classification of “Other Garments” Faegre Drinker
Nov
3
2014
 Beginning to Close the POM Circle? – POM Wonderful and Drug Advertising: JHP Pharmaceuticals Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
3
2014
 PTAB Clarifies Permissible Use of Documents and Evidence McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Nov
3
2014
 IPR Clock Runs Until Allegations Are Nullified McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Nov
3
2014
 Oracle, YP Interactive, and Yellowpages.com v. Click-to-Call Technologies LP, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00312 Faegre Drinker
Nov
3
2014
 PTAB Denies Motion to Amend for Failure to Show Patentability McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Nov
3
2014
 FedEx Corporation v. IpVenture, Inc., Denying Motion to Correct Clerical Mistake IPR2014-00833 Faegre Drinker
Nov
2
2014
 PTAB Does Not Rely on District Court’s Markman Decision in Construing Claim Terms McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Nov
2
2014
 Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Sustains Opposition on the Basis of Fraud McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Nov
2
2014
 Wireless Seismic, Inc. v Fairfield Industries, Inc., Denying Leave to File Supplemental Information IPR2014-01113 Faegre Drinker
Nov
2
2014
 Specificity and Negotiation Are the Buzz Words for IPR Discovery McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Nov
2
2014
 Specificity Key in IPR Petitions McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Nov
2
2014
 A Hypothetical-License Damages Theory Must Be Rooted in Non-Hypothetical Evidence McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Nov
2
2014
 FCC Turns into Quasi-Legislator by Rewriting Opt-Out Notice Provision of Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Vedder Price
Nov
2
2014
 Securities Class Action Dismissed Where Information Was Publicly Available - Reinschmidt v. Zillow, Inc. Katten
Nov
2
2014
 California Federal Courts Tell Insurers Not to Jump the Gun in Suing Policyholders for Reimbursement Proskauer Rose LLP
Nov
2
2014
 Choose Your Battles Before the PTAB – 49 Basis Is Just Too Many! McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Nov
1
2014
 European Court of Justice (ECJ) Rules on Digitization of Library Collections McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Nov
1
2014
 Patent Owner Must Prove Patentability of Proposed Amended Claims (Including Prior Art Date) McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Nov
1
2014
 Too Much Incorporation By Reference Dooms IPR Petition McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Nov
1
2014
 The EEOC Continues to Challenge Employer Wellness Programs Through Litigation Mintz
Nov
1
2014
 Not All Vice Presidents Are Officers and Entitled to Corporate Indemnification McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Nov
1
2014
 Timeliness – The Devil Is in the Details (a.k.a. Rules) McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Nov
1
2014
 Nevada Supreme Court: Exotic Dancers Are Employees Under State’s Law Jackson Lewis P.C.
Nov
1
2014
 Third Circuit: Octane Fitness Changes the Landscape for Trademark Cases Too McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Oct
31
2014
 District Court Holds Video Game Company’s Optimistic Statements Are Not Actionable Katten
Oct
31
2014
 Divided PTAB Panel Denies Issue Joinder as a Matter of Law - Target Corp. v. Destination Maternity Corp. McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Oct
31
2014
 Westlake Services, LLC v. Credit Acceptance Corp., Denying Motion for Request to Stay the Proceeding CBM2014-00176 Faegre Drinker
Oct
31
2014
 Phased Discovery in Patent Litigation: A Powerful Tool Within the Existing Litigation Framework for Combating Actions by Non-Practicing Entities Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Oct
31
2014
 PTAB Designates Seven Recent Decisions as Informative McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Oct
31
2014
 Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Limited, Final Written Decision Update IPR2013-00266 Faegre Drinker
Oct
31
2014
 Transformative Use in the Seventh Circuit McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Oct
31
2014
 Method Implemented on Generic Computers Is Not Patent Eligible, but Method for Processing Paper Checks Is - Salesforce.com, Inc. v. Virtualagility, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp v. Solutrain, Inc. McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Subscribe to Litigation Trial Practice
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters.

 

Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters