| Jun 13 2014 |
Novel Copyright Action Involving Webcasting and Geofencing to be Decided in Harrisonburg, Virginia |
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP |
| Jun 13 2014 |
Aptwater, Inc. v. Thinkvillage-Kerfoot, LLC, Order Denying Motions to Terminate IPR2014-00132, 00133 |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 12 2014 |
Cyanotech Corporation v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Order Addressing the Proper Scope of a Reply |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 12 2014 |
AL-KO Kober, LLC v. Lippert Components Manufacturing, Inc., Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 12 2014 |
Aker Biomarine AS v. Neptune Tech. and BioResources Inc.: Order Granting Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 12 2014 |
Carl Zeiss SMT GMBH v. Nikon Corp., Denying Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Strike |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 12 2014 |
U.S. Supreme Court Allows Pom Wonderful to Pursue Lanham Act Claims against Coca-Cola |
Mintz |
| Jun 12 2014 |
Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects Expansion of the Inducement Doctrine |
ArentFox Schiff LLP |
| Jun 12 2014 |
Symantec Corporation v. RPost Communications Limited: Denying Motion to Seal Exhibit on Federal Rules of Evidence 408 Grounds |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 12 2014 |
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 12, 2014 |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
| Jun 12 2014 |
Bumble Bee Foods, LLC v. William R. Kowalski, Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 12 2014 |
Macronix International Co., Ltd. v. Spansion LLC: Decision on Request for Rehearing of Institution |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 12 2014 |
Apple Inc. v. Achates Reference Publishing, Inc., Final Written Decision |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 12 2014 |
Request for Rehearing of the Board’s Decision Denying Inter Partes Review: Conopco, Inc. dba Unilever v. The Procter & Gamble Company |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 11 2014 |
Polaris Wireless, Inc. v. TruePosition, Inc.: Order Authorizing Motion for Observations and Denying Motion to Strike |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 11 2014 |
Motorola Mobility LLC, Google Inc., and Apple Inc. v. Arendi S.A.R.L.: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 11 2014 |
Dollar Tree's "Scrub Buddies" Cleaning Cloths Targeted for Alleged Design Patent Infringement |
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP |
| Jun 11 2014 |
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 11, 2014 |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
| Jun 11 2014 |
UK High Court Confirms Jurisdiction to Grant Cross-border Declaration of Non-infringement |
Mintz |
| Jun 11 2014 |
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Order Regarding Proposed Challenge to Scope of Reply IPR2013-00368, 371, 372 |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 10 2014 |
Hershey Is Not So Sweet on Maryland Senator’s HERSHEY Campaign Logo |
Mintz |
| Jun 10 2014 |
Square, Inc. v. J. Carl Cooper, Order Denying Authorization to Oppose Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00156 |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 10 2014 |
Patent Co-Owner’s Refusal to Join Suit Defeats Standing to Sue for Patent Infringement |
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP |
| Jun 10 2014 |
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 10, 2014 |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
| Jun 9 2014 |
Square, Inc. v. J. Carl Cooper: Order Denying Request for Rehearing of Institution of Inter Partes Review |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 9 2014 |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Grants in Part Request for Rehearing of its Decision on Live Testimony from Inventor |
Armstrong Teasdale |
| Jun 9 2014 |
Microsoft Corp. v. SurfCast, Inc. Order Granting Additional Briefing IPR2013-00292 |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 9 2014 |
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 9, 2014 |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
| Jun 9 2014 |
Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Personal Audio, LLC, Decision: Denying Request for Reconsideration of Institution Decision IPR2014-00070 |
Faegre Drinker |
| Jun 9 2014 |
Federal Circuit Finds that Public Interest Group Lacks Standing to Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decision |
Armstrong Teasdale |
| Jun 8 2014 |
How Should a Petitioner Address the Technological Invention Exemption in a Petition for Covered Business Method Review? |
Armstrong Teasdale |
| Jun 8 2014 |
What’s My Motivation? To Successfully Petition the PTAB, Experts Should Articulate Reasons for Combining References |
Armstrong Teasdale |
| Jun 7 2014 |
The U.S. Supreme Court Rules On Induced Infringement |
Proskauer Rose LLP |
| Jun 6 2014 |
Providing Expert Testimony On Obviousness Is No Guarantee Of Having A Petition Granted |
Armstrong Teasdale |
| Jun 6 2014 |
Apple, Inc. v. Evolutionary Intelligence, Inc., Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery |
Faegre Drinker |
