| Oct 6 2014 |
Examining the Reach of the Covered Business Method Program |
Armstrong Teasdale |
| Oct 6 2014 |
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 6, 2014 |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
| Oct 6 2014 |
Juniper Networks, Inc. v. Linex Technologies, Inc.: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00595 |
Faegre Drinker |
| Oct 6 2014 |
Patent Term Adjustment: Not available solely in the U.S. |
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP |
| Oct 6 2014 |
Expungement of Unauthorized Filings Under 37 CFR § 42.7(a), MotivePower, Inc. v. Cutsforth, Inc. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 6 2014 |
Unincorporated Associations Can Own and Enforce Trademark Rights, Southern California Darts Association v. Zaffina |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 5 2014 |
A Warehouse Full of Unapproved Genetically-Modified Seeds; Now What?, Syngenta Seeds, Inc. v. Bunge North America, Inc. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 5 2014 |
Delays with Start-Up Visa In Israel Hurt High Tech Firms |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
| Oct 5 2014 |
Apple Inc. v. Smartflash LLC, Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review CBM2014-00104 |
Faegre Drinker |
| Oct 5 2014 |
Top 5 Responsive Web Design Myths Put To Rest |
Consultwebs.com, Inc. |
| Oct 5 2014 |
False Origin Claims Applicable to Services as Well as Goods Regarding Trademarks, M. Arthur Gensler, Jr. & Assoc. v. Strabala |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 5 2014 |
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Depomed, Inc., Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00651 |
Faegre Drinker |
| Oct 5 2014 |
PTAB on Analogous Art, Schott Gemtron Corp. v. SSW Holding Co., Inc. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 5 2014 |
No Motivation to Combine Where Combination Requires Complete Redesign, Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems, Inc. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 4 2014 |
Holy Non-Infringement, Batman!, Fortres Grand Corporation v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 4 2014 |
Judge Posner Orders Sherlock Holmes Estate to Pay Attorneys’ Fees for “Form of Extortion”, Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate, Ltd. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 4 2014 |
Ninth Circuit Finds Permanent Injunction Questionable Despite Trademark Infringement, La Quinta Worldwide LLC v. Q.R.T.M., S.A. De C.V., dba Quinta Real |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 4 2014 |
PTAB Denies Motion to Amend a Motion to Amend; Reason: Delay Tandus Flooring, Inc. v. Interface, Inc. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 4 2014 |
Emerging Technology and Existing Law: Can Geofencing Provide Radio Webcasters a Workaround of Digital Performance Royalties? |
Proskauer Rose LLP |
| Oct 4 2014 |
Movants Face a High Bar to Succeed on Motions to Amend: Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Ltd. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 4 2014 |
Patent Owners: Better Address All Obviousness Arguments Raised by Petitioner, Pharmatech Solutions, Inc. v. LifeScan Scotland Ltd. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 4 2014 |
PTAB Grants Request for Rehearing Relating to Procedure for Serving Petitions, Facebook, Inc. v. Rembrandt Social Media, L.P. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 3 2014 |
Inter Partes Review Not Stayed, Despite Looming Patent Ownership Trial, Symantec Corp. v. RPost Commc’ns Ltd. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 3 2014 |
Don’t Throw It Away: A Company May Not Have Rights to Confidential Information It Puts in the Garbage, Greenpeace, Inc. v. The Dow Chemical Co. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 3 2014 |
Neste Oil OYJ v. REG Synthetic Fuels, LLC, Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion to Strike Reply Evidence IPR2013-00578 |
Faegre Drinker |
| Oct 3 2014 |
Petitioner Barred from Raising Arguments Not in Petition, TRW Automotive US LLC v. Magna Elecs., Inc. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 3 2014 |
Counsel May Confer with a Witness between Cross-Examination and Re-Cross, but the Witness Might Be Re-Crossed on the Substance of Such a Discussion, Organik Kimya AS v. Rohm and Haas Co. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 3 2014 |
Know the Patent Specification Before Filing a Motion to Amend: Veeam Software Corp. v. Symantec Corp. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 3 2014 |
The Narrow Scope of Supplemental Discovery in an Inter Partes Review: Square, Inc., v. REM Holdings 3, LLC |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 3 2014 |
Did the USPTO Really Improve the ‘After Final Consideration Pilot’? |
Mintz |
| Oct 3 2014 |
Supplemental Information Authorization Hard to Come By: International Business Machines Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 3 2014 |
Motions to Amend Hard to Come By: Zodiac Pool Systems, Inc. v. Aqua Products, Inc. |
McDermott Will & Emery |
| Oct 3 2014 |
Apple Inc. v. Smartflash LLC, Decision on Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review |
Faegre Drinker |
| Oct 3 2014 |
Norman International, Inc. v. Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust, Russell L. Hinckley, Sr. (Co-Trustee) and Robert F. Miller (Co-Trustee) Granting and Denying Motion to Submit Supplemental Information |
Faegre Drinker |
| Oct 2 2014 |
K-40 Electronics, LLC v. Escort, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00240 |
Faegre Drinker |
