Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Feb
10
2016
Crestron Electronics v. Intuitive Building Controls: Petitioner Correctly Designated As Supplemental Information Exhibits Offered To Support Contention That References Are Prior Art IPR2015-01379 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
NESTLÉ Healthcare Nutrition v. Steuben Foods: Request for Additional Discovery Denied Where Requesting Sales Agreements To Prove Privity IPR2015-00195, 249 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
Google v. Visual Real Estate: Motion to Exclude Denied For Not Explaining Adequately Its Objections to Admissibility IPR2014-01339 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.: Decision on Institution Granting Joinder IPR2016-00167 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
Lumentum Holdings, Inc. et al. v. Capella Photonics, Inc.: Order Granting Motion to Compel IPR2015-00731 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 10, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
10
2016
TRW Automotive U.S. LLC v. Magna Electronics: Request for Additional Discovery Denied for Not Showing It Would Be Necessary In The Interests of Justice IPR2015-00436 Faegre Drinker
Feb
9
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 9, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
9
2016
Oracle Corp. v. Crossroads Systems: Final Written Decision finding Four-Month Period of Inactivity Sufficient to Defeat Patent Owner’s Claim of Diligence IPR2014-01209 Faegre Drinker
Feb
9
2016
Federal Circuit Finds No "Way" To Support Doctrine Of Equivalents Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
8
2016
Obama Launches Cancer Moonshot Task Force – But Where’s Patent Power? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
8
2016
He’s got 99 Problems, But a Breach Might NOT be One Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
8
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 8, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
8
2016
Groundhog Day: Declaring Impending Death of Massachusetts Noncompetes Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
8
2016
Foreign Filing Restrictions and Licenses in Russia – Part 4 Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
7
2016
Tietex Int’l, Ltd. v. Precision Fabrics Group, Inc., Inherency Not Established in Final Written Decision Finding Claims Not Unpatentable IPR2014-01248 Faegre Drinker
Feb
6
2016
BMC Medical, 3B Products, and 3B Medical v. ResMed - Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-01196 Faegre Drinker
Feb
5
2016
Website HTML Is Copyrightable, Even If Look and Feel Is Not Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
5
2016
Apple, Inc. v. VirnetX Inc - Decision Confirming that Section 315(b) Time Limit Does Not Apply to Request for Joinder IPR2016-00062 Faegre Drinker
Feb
5
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 5, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
5
2016
Coalition for Affordable Drugs V LLC v. Biogen International GmbH - Denying Rehearing of Decision Not to Institute Based on Lack of Showing of Abuse of Discretion IPR2015-01086 Faegre Drinker
Feb
4
2016
Design Patent Case Digest: Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Covidien, Inc. Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
4
2016
Lupin Pharmaceuticals v. Senju Pharm: Review Instituted and Joinder Granted IPR2015-01871 Faegre Drinker
Feb
4
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 4, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
4
2016
High Stakes Race Between Apple and VirnetX: Will PTAB Trump Texas Jury's Award of $326.5M? Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
4
2016
Asset Transferee Cannot Appeal Reexamination Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
3
2016
Defend Trade Secrets Act — Congress Tries Again Jackson Lewis P.C.
Feb
3
2016
New Jersey District Court Allows Trade Secret Misappropriation Claims to Proceed Despite Finding Subsequent Employer Did Not Induce Breach of Restrictive Covenants Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Feb
3
2016
Ocean Tomo v. Patent Ratings: Denying Institution for Lack of Standing where Petitioner Not Previously Sued for Patent Infringement CBM2015-00157 Faegre Drinker
Feb
3
2016
Google v. Michael Meiresonne: Final Written Decision Finding Assertions of Long-Felt Need to be Unpersuasive IPR2014-01188 Faegre Drinker
Feb
3
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 3, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
3
2016
Sophos v. Finjan: Denying Request for Rehearing that included Argument Not Previously Raised IPR2015-01022 Faegre Drinker
Feb
3
2016
Symantec Corp. v. Finjan: Denying Institution in View of Piecemeal Claim Limitation Presentation IPR2015-01548 Faegre Drinker
Feb
3
2016
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp Techtronic One World Tech v. Irwin Industrial Tool Co: Granting Rehearing where Typographical Error in Petition Resulted in Board Overlooking Asserted Grounds IPR2015-01462 Faegre Drinker
Feb
3
2016
Apple v. Chestnut Hill Sound: Denying Institution where Indirect Application of Signal Found to be Outside of Claim Scope IPR2015-01464 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins