Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Feb
25
2016
Post-Grant Review Estoppel Applies on Claim-by-Claim Basis McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
In Obviousness Analysis Loss of Benefit Is Not the Same as Inoperable McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Previously Denied Section 101 Defense Rendered Meritorious by the Supreme Court’s Alice Decision McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Multiplying Claim Requirements After Trial Makes Things Impermissibly Complex McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Attorneys’ Fee Award Cannot Be Enhanced to Deter Misconduct McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Federal Circuit Backs Finding of Inequitable Conduct in Reexamination of Prosthetics Patent Mintz
Feb
25
2016
PTAB Exercises Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Patents Involved in IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Federal Circuit Precedents on Domestic and International Patent Exhaustion Principles Remain Unchanged McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Patent Term Adjustment Versus Double Patenting Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
25
2016
Rosa Parks Name and Likeness Free for Use? McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
“Supplemental Evidence” Versus “Supplemental Information” in Patent Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
PTAB: On Second Thought, Your IPR Is Instituted McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
In Wake of Dynamic Drinkware, PTAB Rejects Prior Art Due to Petitioner’s Failure to Establish Earlier Priority Dates McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
Three Most Important Things at PTAB: Rules, Rules, Rules McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
First Complaint Triggers One Year Time Bar for IPR Petition McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
No Institution Based Solely on Unsupported Expert Testimony McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
Re-Registration of a Domain Name Constitutes “Registration” Under the ACPA McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
Monkey See, Monkey Sue Doesn’t Fly Under U.S. Copyright Law Mintz
Feb
24
2016
Copyright Act Statute of Limitations: Waiting to File Makes No (50) Cents McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories v. Galderma Lab: Institution Denied Where Patent Entitled to Earlier Priority Date IPR2015-01778 Faegre Drinker
Feb
24
2016
Mitchell Intl v. Audatex North America: Final Written Decision Finding All Claims Unpatentable Subject Matter CBM2014-00171 Faegre Drinker
Feb
24
2016
Ambiguous Allegations, Lack Of Imminent Harm, And Delay In Taking Action Doom Request For Temporary Restraining Order Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Feb
24
2016
Window of Opportunity for CTM Owners in the EU to Refine Scope of Their Marks Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
23
2016
First Data Corp v. Coqui Tech: Decision Denying Institution Where Petitioner Does Not Provide Adequate Structure Corresponding To Alleged Means-Plus-Function Limitations IPR2015-01667 Faegre Drinker
Feb
23
2016
Ohio Willow Wood’s Appeal of IC Finding Goes Up In Smoke Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
23
2016
NHK Seating of America v. Lear Corp: Final Written Decision Finding Most Of The Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-01200 Faegre Drinker
Feb
22
2016
Shenzhen Huiding Tech v. Synaptics: Denying-in-Part Institution on Incorporation by Reference Grounds IPR2015-01739 Faegre Drinker
Feb
22
2016
TRW Automotive v. MAGNA Electronics: Evidence Excluded For Insufficient Evidence To Support Finding That It Is What Proponent Claims It Is IPR2014-01347 Faegre Drinker
Feb
22
2016
Hilti v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation: Authorizing Motion for Additional Discovery as to Documents Held by Third Parties IPR2015-01164; IPR2015-01165; IPR2015-01166 Faegre Drinker
Feb
22
2016
CHUMS and CROAKIES v. CABLZ: No Nexus When Commercial Success Is Dependent On Element In Prior Art IPR2014-01240 Faegre Drinker
Feb
22
2016
New Year Trademark Audit: Time for Reflection and Renewal Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
22
2016
Out With the Old, In With the New re: Company Rebranding Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
22
2016
Federal Circuit Employs Phillips Claim Construction to Measure Claims Amended in Reexamination for Possible Intervening Rights Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
19
2016
Massachusetts Jury Verdict Stands After Court Ruling on Laches Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
19
2016
The En Banc Federal Circuit Holds That Patent Rights Are Not Exhausted by Prior Restricted Sales or by Foreign Sales Hunton Andrews Kurth
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins