Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Mar
21
2016
9 Reasons Your Start-Up Needs Patents Mintz
Mar
21
2016
Improper Use of Commercial Signs — Proposed Revisions to Article 5 of the PRC Anti-Unfair Competition Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
21
2016
No Due Process Violation Where Judgment Entered on Patents Not Asserted at Trial Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
21
2016
Ford Motor Co. v. Paice Abell Found: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-01416 Faegre Drinker
Mar
21
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 21, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
21
2016
Coalition For Affordable Drugs v. Acorda Therapeutics: Institution Granted Where SEC Filing Found to be Printed Publication IPR2015-01853 Faegre Drinker
Mar
20
2016
Continental Automotive GmbH, Kia Motors Corporation, and Kia Motors America, Inc. v. Netlach, LLC, Patent Owner’s Request for Adverse Judgment Granted IPR2015-00481 Faegre Drinker
Mar
18
2016
PTAB Cannot Rely on Key Factual Assertions First Made at Oral Argument—Patent Owners are Entitled to Notice of and a Fair Opportunity to Meet All Grounds Mintz
Mar
18
2016
Alleviate the Fear of a License Counterparty Filing for Bankruptcy Polsinelli PC
Mar
18
2016
IBG LLC v. Trading Tech. Int’l, Inc - Instituting CBM Review for Patent with Claim Encompassing Transitory, Propagating Signal CBM2015-00182 Faegre Drinker
Mar
18
2016
Federal Circuit Reaffirms Its Longstanding Patent Exhaustion Precedents in Lexmark. v. Impression Products (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2016) (en banc) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
18
2016
In Re Ray Smith: Gaming Art Patents Now a Bad Bet Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
17
2016
IKEA Indonesia Case Highlights the Importance of Prudent Management of International Trademark Portfolios Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Mar
17
2016
Patent Litigation: Could Eastern District of Texas’s Reign Come to End? Mintz
Mar
17
2016
Patent Term Adjustment In South Korea Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
16
2016
President Obama Nominates Merrick Garland to fill Scalia Vacancy Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
16
2016
Coalition for Affordable Drugs V v. Hoffman-LaRoche: Institution Denied IPR2015-01792 Faegre Drinker
Mar
16
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 16, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
16
2016
Design Marks: Comparing and Tacking Katten
Mar
15
2016
Federal Circuit Won’t Review USPTO’s Alice Guidelines Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
15
2016
TTAB Allows Only One Bite at the Apple Katten
Mar
15
2016
When Is Discount Pricing Considered to be Deceptive? Practical “Tips” Katten
Mar
15
2016
PTAB Institutes Kyle Bass IPR Against Pharmaceutical Patent Based On SEC Document Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
15
2016
Trademark Registration Cancelled for De Minimis Use Katten
Mar
15
2016
Issue Preclusion Applied to Priority Dispute at TTAB Katten
Mar
15
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 15, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
15
2016
PTAB Institutes Kyle Bass IPRs Against Juxtapid Patents Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
14
2016
Symantec Corp. v. Finjan: Denying Request for Rehearing that Separately Argued Claims Previously Analyzed Together in Petition IPR2015-01545 Faegre Drinker
Mar
14
2016
Oxford Nanopore Tech v. Univ. of Washington: Final Written Decision finding Displayed Poster to be Printed Publication IPR2014-00513 Faegre Drinker
Mar
14
2016
What Are USPTO’s Patent Plans for Fiscal Year 2017? Mintz
Mar
12
2016
Designers beware: UK Supreme Court confirms that images alone will determine the scope of registered design protection Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
12
2016
Second Circuit Tosses Out Time-Barred Copyright Claims Against Jay Z Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
11
2016
The Federal Circuit Newly Recognizes Patent-Agent Privilege Mintz
Mar
11
2016
Recent Developments in Recordal Procedures for Trademark Licenses in China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
11
2016
BPCIA Patent Litigation Webinar Recap Mintz
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins