Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Jun
30
2016
USPTO Launches Cancer Immunotherapy Pilot Program Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
30
2016
Trademark Dilution Update: NYC BEER Is Not Diluted, But The Empire State Building Is Mintz
Jun
30
2016
Acquiescence Defense – Don’t Try to Use It Too Early McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 30, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
30
2016
Forecast Unfavorable for Inventory Software Patent Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
30
2016
Overview of USTR’s 2016 Special 301 Report on State of Inter Partes Review in Argentina Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
30
2016
Intrinsic Feature in All Described Embodiments Makes Patent Claim Insurmountable McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2016
When Distinguishing Statements May Be Considered Disclaimers of Patent Claim Scope McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2016
Pitfalls When Refiling Priority Patent Application Under Article 4 of Paris Convention Mintz
Jun
30
2016
Look to Specification to Interpret Facially Unclear Patent Claims: Howmedica Osteonics v. Zimmer McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2016
In Patents, Narrow Construction May Apply When No Evidence Supports Broader Construction McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2016
Patent Infringement: Pennsylvania Court Invalidates Improper Multiple Dependent Claims Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
30
2016
Brumley Heirs Win Fight over Rights to Old Gospel Song McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2016
Examiner.com Sails to Victory in DMCA Safe Harbor - Digital Millennium Copyright Act McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2016
Inter Partes Review Institution Decisions Not Appealable, Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Remains Standard McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
29
2016
Federal Circuit Distinguishes “Motivation to Combine” from “Expectation of Success” for Obviousness Purposes McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
29
2016
Supreme Court Holds that Decision to Institute IPR is Non-appealable and PTAB’s “Broadest Reasonable Construction” Standard for Claim Construction is Lawful ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jun
29
2016
Binding Contract or Completed Sale Not Necessary to Raise On-Sale Bar McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
29
2016
No Waiver of Forum Selection Clause Despite Filing Declaratory Judgment Action in Non-Selected Forum McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
29
2016
Evolving Patent Eligibility Standard for Computer-Implemented Inventions McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
29
2016
The New Federalization of Trade Secret Law – What You Should Know About the DTSA McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
29
2016
Another Unregistrable Trademark Surname: DICKMAN’S Pickles Mintz
Jun
29
2016
The New Willfulness Paradigm: Supreme Court Patent Infringement Case McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
29
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 29, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
29
2016
EU Trade Secrets Directive and Brexit: Keep Quiet and Carry On Bracewell LLP
Jun
29
2016
Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief Denied: Modtruss Stumbles on “Same” Problem with Battlefrog Obstacles Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
29
2016
Heading for Brexit: Will United Kingdom's Intellectual Property Protections Brexit Too? Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
28
2016
Review Your Trademark Portfolio Every Which Way Faegre Drinker
Jun
28
2016
Brexit – What could happen to my IP rights? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
28
2016
California District Court Judge Issues TRO and Preliminary Injunction Under the Defend Trade Secrets Act Mintz
Jun
28
2016
Trademarks Confusion: MAYA And MAYARI Are Not Confusingly Similar When Used On Wine Mintz
Jun
28
2016
Are U.S. Patents Good Outside of USA? IP for Start-Ups Part IV [VIDEO] Mintz
Jun
28
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 28, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
28
2016
Supreme Court Deals Blow To Diagnostic Method Patents, Denies Cert In Sequenom Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
27
2016
Keep Calm and IP On: Planning for UK IP Post-Brexit Mintz
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins