Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Aug
3
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 3, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
2
2016
Patent Eligibility: A Response to Rejections Under 35 USC §101 Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
2
2016
USPTO Launches Patents 4 Patients Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
1
2016
Groundhog Day for Massachusetts Non-Compete Reform Jackson Lewis P.C.
Aug
1
2016
You Cannot Create A Restrictive Covenant Out of Thin Air Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
1
2016
ITC Declines To Reach Question Of Whether Laches Is An Available Defense In Section 337 Investigations Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
1
2016
Ninth Circuit Provides Clarification Concerning the Definition of Trade Secret Mintz
Aug
1
2016
Apple v. Samsung: Design Patent Case of the Century Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
1
2016
Trademark Infringement in Ferragamo S.p.A. v. Ferragamo Winery: Foul Play or Sour Grapes? Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
1
2016
August 2016 Update - ICANN gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
1
2016
Ultimate Armwrestling League Flexes Its Legal Muscles over Use of Copyrighted Photo Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
1
2016
Distinctiveness Threshold for Stylization of Descriptive Marks Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
29
2016
Early Post-Brexit Considerations for International Business Faegre Drinker
Jul
29
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 29, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
29
2016
CRISPR Update – July 2016 Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
29
2016
Parent Company Furnishes Cancellation of Subsidiary’s Trademark Registration Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
28
2016
Down to the Wire for Proposed Non-Compete Reform Legislation in Massachusetts Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jul
28
2016
The Whole Claim Is More Inventive Than the Sum of Its Generic Parts McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
Hyper-Divergence: Halo and the Preliminary Injunction Requirement for Enhanced Damages Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
27
2016
Opportunity for Response when Claim Construction Changes McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
Prior Art References Introduced After IPR Institution Are Permissible to Show State of Art McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
Federal Circuit Rubberstamps 50-Year-Old Practice to Save 10,000 Continuation Patents McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
Indirect Patent Infringement Can Be Based on Willful Blindness and Circumstantial Evidence McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
IPR Institution Decisions Not Appealable, Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Remains Standard McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
Defend Trade Secrets Act — Implications for Private Funds Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
27
2016
Physical Combinability of References Not Necessarily Required for Obviousness McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
Magnum Offers New Path for Challenging AIA Decisions: Burden of Production Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
27
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 27, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
27
2016
No Rehearing on Dual Use PTAB Panels McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
Indacon v. Facebook: Claim Terms with No Specialized Meaning in Art Always Linked to Specification McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
DMCA Safe Harbor Protection Includes Pre-1972 Recordings McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
Life Technologies v. Promega Corp: Inducement and Risk of Liability for Worldwide Sales McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
Technology License Agreements: Arm’s Length Royalty Rates Save Medtronic from $1.36 Billion IRS Tax Deficiency McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
In First Set of Post-Grant Review Decisions, PTAB Strikes Down Patents Based on Alice McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
Patent Infringement: Promises And Pitfalls Of 3D Printing Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins