Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Aug
29
2016
Indefiniteness of Means-Plus-Function Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
Indirect Infringement Not Overcome by Objective Strength of Non-Infringement Case McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
Prevailing Party Before PTAB May Not Appeal McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
Patent Infringement Claim Exempts Related Counterclaims from Mandatory Arbitration McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
Concerted Actions with Sister Company in Finland Result in Delaware Jurisdiction McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act 180-Day Notice of Intent to Market a Biosimilar Is Required, Enforceable by Injunction McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
BASCOM Global Internet v. ATT Mobility: Specific, Discrete Implementation of Abstract Idea Is Patent Eligible McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
Amendments to Indonesian Patent Law Come into Effect Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
29
2016
Federal Circuit Rebukes PTAB for Shifting Burden of Proof to Patentee in IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
Intellectual Property: When Applying Alice, Evaluate Invention as Whole McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
First Application of Supreme Court’s Halo Willfulness Framework McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
En Banc Court Ties On-Sale Bar to Commercial Sale in Accordance with Uniform Commercial Code McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 29, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
29
2016
Alice v. CLS Bank Software Patents Scorecard, Two Years Later Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
28
2016
International Trade Commission Opinion Explaining Reasons It Deferred to PTAB Unpatentability Ruling Provides Grist for Future Challenges Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
28
2016
Antitrust Agencies Propose Updates to Intellectual Property Licensing Guidelines and Invite Comments Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
26
2016
Edible Arrangements’ Trademark Case Bears Fruit Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
26
2016
A Novel Outcome at the International Trade Commission: Patent Claims Invalidated Under Alice in the 100-Day Pilot Program Mintz
Aug
26
2016
United States International Trade Commission's ALJ Shaw Finds Claims Patent-Ineligible After Fast-Track Hearing On Section 101 Issues Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
26
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 26, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
25
2016
The Evolving Standard for Pleading Direct Patent Infringement Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
25
2016
D.C. Circuit Refuses Terror Victims’ Attempt to Seize Internet Domain Names: War of World Wide Webs Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
25
2016
Cybersecurity: Augmented Reality McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
25
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 25, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
24
2016
Industrial Espionage and the Defend Trade Secrets Act Mintz
Aug
24
2016
Update on Peter Doig: Artist Sued for Denying He Created Art Piece Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
24
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 24, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
23
2016
Federal Circuit Emphasizes that an Obviousness Analysis Based on Common Sense Must be Supported by Substantial Evidence and Explained with Sufficient Reasoning Mintz
Aug
23
2016
Brexit and Patent Law: What You Need to Know Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
23
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 23, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
23
2016
Federal Circuit Affirms Tygacil Formulation Patent Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
22
2016
USPTO Announces Cancer Moonshot Challenge Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
22
2016
Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple, Inc. – Defining “Common Sense” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
22
2016
Ariosa Loses Verinata Patent Challenge Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
22
2016
Marco v. Polo: Navigating Around “Likelihood of Confusion” Refusals Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins