Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Nov
8
2018
PTAB Boardside Chat Provides Further Details About New Amendment Procedure Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
7
2018
European Patent Office Issues New Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Mintz
Nov
6
2018
USPTO Addresses IDS PTA Deduction Error Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
5
2018
§102(b) Printed Publication: Unrestricted Distribution at a Trade Show Mintz
Nov
5
2018
First-Filed Rule Prompts Dismissal of Heated Products Case in Favor of Warmer Venue Proskauer Rose LLP
Nov
5
2018
The Supreme Court May Finally Give Guidance On Trademark Protections In Bankruptcy Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Nov
3
2018
USPTO Adopts Federal Court Claim Construction Standard for AIA Proceedings: Singing the Same Claim Construction Tune Bracewell LLP
Nov
2
2018
Federal Courts in Louisiana Recognize Trend in Trade Secret Cases Bracewell LLP
Oct
30
2018
Can the Government Challenge Patents via AIA Proceedings? — Return Mail Gets Cert. Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
30
2018
USPTO Access To Relevant Prior Art Initiative Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
29
2018
Gun Trigger Patent Lawsuit Misfire Does Not Warrant “Exceptional Case” Finding Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
26
2018
USPTO Announces Proposal To Facilitate Amendments In AIA Challenges Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
26
2018
Federal Circuit Denies RPX’s Request for en banc Review in Applications in Internet Time v. RPX Mintz
Oct
26
2018
Supreme Court to Address Meaning of “Full Costs” as Used in Copyright Act McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
26
2018
Copyright Board’s Royalty Rates for Streaming Services Can Play On McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
26
2018
Photographers’ Claims Against the NFL Score a Touchdown McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
26
2018
No Substantial Similarity Between TV Shows Empire and Cream McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
26
2018
“Close-Call” Involving Recurrent Online Sales Triggers Minimum Contacts, Specific Jurisdiction McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
26
2018
Not Even a Sporting Chance for Registration McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
26
2018
One Is the Loneliest Number to Institute . . . Two Is Just as Odd as One, but Under SAS It’s Simply All or None McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
26
2018
What Happens in Vegas: Reopening Prosecution Not Inconsistent with Right to Appeal McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
26
2018
The Gene Editing Is Out of the Bottle: No Interference-in-Fact Between Claimed Inventions McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2018
THE LATEST: DOJ and FTC Take Divergent Positions on Intellectual Property Issue McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2018
RPI, I Presume? Petitioner Has Evidentiary Burden that RPIs Are Correct McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2018
Tick Tock: Even a Dismissed Complaint Counts Toward Time Bar McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2018
Creating Abuse-Resistant Treatments for Opioid Dependence Is Not So Obvious After All McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2018
“Blocking Patent” Deterrence Effect May Discount Secondary Considerations for Follow-On Patents McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2018
“Configured to” or “Capable of”: That Is the Question McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2018
OSI Layers Take the Cake – Plain Language Outweighs Prosecution History Disavowal McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2018
Prediction: “Plain and Ordinary Meaning” Is Not Particularly Plain or Ordinary McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2018
Federal Circuit Clarifies Role of Consumer Demand in Terms of Entire Market Value McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2018
Reasonable PTAB Determinations Supported by Substantial Evidence Will Be Sustained McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2018
Consistent Witness Testimony Gives Teeth to Assertion of Public Availability McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2018
A High Bar for Fee Awards Against the Bar McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2018
Overlapping Ranges Give Rise to Presumption of Obviousness in IPRs McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins