Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Sep
10
2019
International Trade Commission ALJ Holds that Relying on Pre-Suit Testing Waives Privilege Protection Mintz
Sep
9
2019
How to Get a PTAB Decision Designated Precedential Polsinelli PC
Sep
8
2019
WIPO Launches UDRP for .CN and .中国 ccTLD Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
5
2019
Automotive MarketTrends | September 2019, Issue 3 Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
4
2019
Debunking Copyright Myths Faegre Drinker
Sep
3
2019
From the Salon Chair to Court: L’Oréal Found Liable for Trade Secret Theft and Patent Infringement Brinks Gilson & Lione
Sep
3
2019
INO v. Praxair – Method-by-Selection Claims Fail Mayo/Alice Test Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
3
2019
The Faithless Servant Doctrine: Can an Employer Claw Back Compensation from an Employee Who Binge-Watches “Friends” During Work Hours? Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Sep
3
2019
Patent Prosecution and FDA Compliance Expenses May Help Satisfy the ITC’s Domestic Industry Requirement Mintz
Sep
3
2019
Statements of Efficacy and Safety Material Claim Limitations Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
3
2019
Federal Circuit Finds Method Withholding Treatment Ineligible For Patenting Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
2
2019
UPDATE: California Senate Bill 206 Moves Closer To Becoming Law Jackson Lewis P.C.
Aug
31
2019
Timeframe of Willfull infringement a Factor when Considering Attorneys' Fee Award McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2019
Unique Procedural Posture Leads to No Sanctions in Frivolous Appeal McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2019
No Competitor Standing for Appeal of IPR Decision Upholding Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2019
Narrow Claim Construction is Out of Sync with Broad Intrinsic Evidence McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2019
Clear Disavowal in Specification Can't be Remedied by Non-Material Change in Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2019
Doctrine of Equivalents: It's Over Before it Begins McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2019
Accessibility, not Access is Proper Legal Touchstone for § 102(B) McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2019
Retroactive Application Of IPRS To Pre-AIA Patents Is Not Unconstitutional Taking McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2019
Recent Developments In The Licensing Of Standards Essential Patents Wiggin and Dana LLP
Aug
30
2019
Mismatch Between Claims And Specification Leads To Invalidity McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2019
Incomplete Hybridization: Lack Of Enablement Found Where Claims Encompass Thousands Of Possibilities McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2019
For Simple, Predictable Tech, Undisclosed Variations May Be Covered By Written Description McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2019
Italian Film Composer “Scores” for Authors Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2019
Fractured Federal Circuit Maintains Ineligibility Of Diagnostic Methods McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2019
Check Processing Claims Bounce McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2019
One-Year Time Bar Triggered After the Service of a Complaint, Regardless of Whether the Serving Party Lacked Standing to Sue Polsinelli PC
Aug
28
2019
Not So Fast And Furious – Executive Indicted for Stealing Self-Driving Car Trade Secrets Jones Walker LLP
Aug
27
2019
Recent ITC Ruling Highlights Ability of Patentees to Rely on Accused Infringers’ Investments to Satisfy Domestic Industry Requirement and Potential Pitfall of Affirmative Defense Mintz
Aug
27
2019
Nalproprion v. Actavis: WDR met by Substantially Equivalent Claim Elements(?) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
27
2019
All Complaints Once Served—Even Defective Complaints that are Dismissed—Trigger the IPR Time Bar Mintz
Aug
27
2019
Federal Circuit Contrives Substantially Similar Written Description Test Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
26
2019
“Addressing Video Game Claims Under the Phillips Standard at the PTAB” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
23
2019
Alexa: What is venue? Mintz
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins