Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Apr
22
2015
USPTO Director Lee Endorses Innovation Act But Suggests Tweaks Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
Apr
22
2015
Supreme Court Holds TTAB Ruling May Preclude Re-litigation of Trademark Issues Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
Apr
22
2015
TRW Automotive U.S. LLC v. Magna Electronics Inc., Denying Institution IPR2014-01346 Faegre Drinker
Apr
22
2015
Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc. Denying Request for Rehearing Faegre Drinker
Apr
22
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 22, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
22
2015
Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Bennett Regulator Guards: Granting Motion to Expunge IPR2013-00453 Faegre Drinker
Apr
21
2015
Does the America Invents Act (AIA) Have a Prior Art Exception You Can Use? Mintz
Apr
21
2015
U.S. Brand Holders Anticipating Business in Cuba Can and Should Protect Trademarks Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Apr
21
2015
Sony Computer Ent v. Game Controller Technology: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00634 Faegre Drinker
Apr
21
2015
Patent Legislation Goes Mainstream Covington & Burling LLP
Apr
21
2015
New Guidance Regarding Employee Handbooks Part Three: How Much Do Employers “Own” Their Logo, Copyright and Trademark? Faegre Drinker
Apr
21
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 21, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
21
2015
Implications of the Dallas Buyers Club Decision on Workplace Piracy Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
21
2015
An In-Depth Look At USPTO Patent Quality Problems Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
20
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 20, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
20
2015
Third Party Observations in Europe – Part 5 of an 8 Part Series Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
17
2015
Askeladden LLC v. Sean I. McGhie and Brian Buchheit: Order on Conduct of the Proceeding IPR2015-00122-125, 133, 137 Faegre Drinker
Apr
17
2015
Joint Defendants Succeed on Motion to Stay Pending Reexam Proskauer Rose LLP
Apr
17
2015
Tempur Sealy v. Select Comfort: Denying Institution IPR2014-01419 Faegre Drinker
Apr
17
2015
BIO Files Brief in Support of Mandatory Notice Requirement in the BPCIA Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
17
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 17, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
17
2015
USPTO Makes Changes to American Invents Act Post Grant Proceedings Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
17
2015
House Judiciary Committee Holds Hearing on Innovation Act, Fee-Shifting Mintz
Apr
16
2015
Google v. Unwired Planet: Final Written Decision CBM2014-00006 Faegre Drinker
Apr
16
2015
Section 337’s Potential for Defending Biologics Market Share Against Biosimilars Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
16
2015
DOJ’s Endorsement of IEEE Patent Policy Takes Center Stage at IP Antitrust Conference Mintz
Apr
16
2015
Genetic Engineering Makes the Blacklist Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
16
2015
Bank of the West v. Secure Axcess, LLC: Denying Motion for Joinder CBM2015-00009 Faegre Drinker
Apr
16
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 16, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
15
2015
Valeo North America, Inc. v. Magna Electronics, Inc.: Granting Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2014-01204 Faegre Drinker
Apr
15
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 15, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
15
2015
Adobe Systems Incorporated and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Afluo, LLC: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00153 Faegre Drinker
Apr
15
2015
GSI Tech v. Cypress Semiconductor Corp: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00121 Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2015
Supreme Court Decision Gives Preclusive Effect to TTAB Rulings Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Apr
14
2015
Attacking A Patent By Filing Multiple Inter Partes Review Petitions Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins