| Feb 28 2014 |
Non-Practicing Entities' (NPE) Tough Talk Promising Litigation Against Comcast Becomes Self-fulfilling Prophecy |
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP |
| Feb 28 2014 |
Strategy of Offering Refunds to Moot Class Actions Gains Traction |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
| Feb 28 2014 |
France Finally Embraces Class Actions |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
| Feb 27 2014 |
Copyright Registration Does Not Trigger the Statute of Limitation for a Co-Authorship Claim: Brownstein v. Lindsay |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
| Feb 27 2014 |
Ninth Circuit Once Again Affirms That Malicious Actions To Destroy A Competitor Do Not State An Antitrust Claim Unless Accompanied By Injury To Competition |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Feb 27 2014 |
Paper Company, Arguing that FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) Lacks Jurisdiction over Demand Response, Files Motion to Dismiss FERC Manipulation Action |
Bracewell LLP |
| Feb 27 2014 |
Can a Consumer Products Company Moot Class Actions by Offering a Refund? |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
| Feb 26 2014 |
Declaratory Judgment Dismissed Without Prejudice Does Not Bar Later IPR (Inter Partes Review): Clio USA, Inc. v. The Procter and Gamble Company |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
| Feb 26 2014 |
Expert Testimony Not Required for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Claim, Tennessee Court Rules |
Jackson Lewis P.C. |
| Feb 26 2014 |
California Courts Tackle Meaning of “May” Under the Finance Lenders Law |
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP |
| Feb 25 2014 |
When 30 Days Just Isn’t Enough: The Ninth Circuit Rules that Defendants’ Right to Remove May Not be Limited to 30 Days |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Feb 25 2014 |
Forum Selection Clauses and Non-Compete Agreements |
Faegre Drinker |
| Feb 25 2014 |
Delaware Chancery Court Declines to Apply Offer-of-Judgment Rule in Appraisal Proceedings |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Feb 24 2014 |
De Novo Review of District Court Claim Construction Is Here to Stay—For Now |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
| Feb 24 2014 |
Lighting Ballast v. Philips – Federal Circuit Will Maintain De Novo Review of Claim Construction |
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP |
| Feb 24 2014 |
Lightning Ballast II – Judge Lourie Tries to Get to “The Facts of the Matter” Re: Intellectual Property Litigation |
Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. |
| Feb 21 2014 |
2, 4, 6, 8…NFL Cheerleaders Not “Rah Rah-ing” About Pay Rate |
Mintz |
| Feb 21 2014 |
Rule 30(b)(6) Depositions: Who Speaks for the Company? |
Barnes & Thornburg LLP |
| Feb 20 2014 |
A Virginia Bill to Expedite Judicial Decisions in Civil Cases |
Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C. |
| Feb 19 2014 |
Comity and Commonality: A Tale of Two Identical Class Actions Brought By Forum-Shopping Plaintiffs’ Counsel |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Feb 19 2014 |
Georgia Jury Left To Decide If Camouflage Patterns Have Specific Protectable Elements Re: Georgia IP Litigation |
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP |
| Feb 18 2014 |
The Supreme Court of Canada Seeks to Rein-In Court Costs: A New Approach for Summary Judgment Motions in Ontario |
Dickinson Wright PLLC |
| Feb 18 2014 |
North Carolina Court Discusses Application of Res Judicata in Quasi-Judicial Land Use Proceedings |
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP |
| Feb 17 2014 |
Following Daubert Hearing, Federal Court Refuses to Certify Proposed Medical Monitoring Class |
Beveridge & Diamond PC |
| Feb 15 2014 |
Cathay Pacific Airlines Settles Freight Shipping Price-Fixing Class Action |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
| Feb 15 2014 |
Ten Years Later: North Carolina Catches Up With Rule 702, Adopts Daubert and Bids Adieu to Howerton Re: Expert Witness Testimony |
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP |
| Feb 13 2014 |
Ninth Circuit Concludes That Common Issues Do Not Predominate Where Retailer’s In-Store Signs and Oral Sales Statements Place Each Putative Class Member’s Exposure to Misleading Statements in Doubt |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Feb 11 2014 |
Virgin v Jet Airways: English Courts Cannot Undermine EPO (European Patent Office) Patent Grant |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
| Feb 11 2014 |
Maryland District Court Denies Certification of TCPA (Telephone Consumer Protection Act) Class Action Because Class Members Were Not Ascertainable |
Faegre Drinker |
| Feb 11 2014 |
Federal Circuit Clarifies Standard for Recovery of E-Discovery Costs |
Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
| Feb 11 2014 |
Denying Motion for Conditional Certification, NY District Court Says FLSA (Fair Labor Standards Act) Notice and Opt-In Process Is Not A Discovery Device |
Jackson Lewis P.C. |
| Feb 11 2014 |
Proper Rebuttal Experts |
Armstrong Teasdale |
| Feb 11 2014 |
Supreme Court Limits Stipulations to Circumvent CAFA (Class Action Fairness Act) |
Armstrong Teasdale |
| Feb 11 2014 |
Western District Holds Time to Refile Suit Under Missouri Savings Statute Runs From Date of Filing Motion to Dismiss |
Armstrong Teasdale |
| Feb 10 2014 |
Louisiana Federal Court Jurisdictional Minimum Not Met in Chemical Explosion Case |
Beveridge & Diamond PC |
