Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Jul
31
2009
Abstention as an Alternative: Bankruptcy Court Is Not Always the Best Place to Be Much Shelist, P.C.
Jul
31
2009
Notice Pleading: A Recent Supreme Court Decision May Upset an Ingrained Legal Standard Much Shelist, P.C.
May
26
2009
Defamation Suits in Illinois: Businesses Beware the Citizen Participation Act Much Shelist, P.C.
Sep
21
2012
Employers Beware: The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Is a Sword with Two Edges Much Shelist, P.C.
May
29
2009
Grappling with Electronic Discovery Much Shelist, P.C.
May
31
2009
Class Action Arbitration on the Rise: Beware the Risks Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
11
2009
Arbitration Clauses: Why Nursing Facilities Should Consider Adding Them to New Resident Contracts Much Shelist, P.C.
Jun
14
2011
What Third-Party Retaliation Means for Your Business Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
26
2010
Patent Precautions: Avoiding Errors in Inventorship Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
22
2012
Additional Insured Endorsements Continue to be the Subject of Litigation in Illinois Much Shelist, P.C.
Dec
24
2012
"All Knowledge Is Inferential": Is the Use of Qualifiers In An Affidavit Sufficient? Much Shelist, P.C.
Dec
10
2014
Today’s Contracts Enforceability Issues, Part II: Those Pesky Forum Selection Clauses Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
24
2012
Enforcing Non-Compete Agreements: Go Where the Case Law Is Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
27
2010
Confession of Judgment in Illinois: A Deceptively Simple Remedy Much Shelist, P.C.
Dec
10
2011
Debtors Need Lawyers, Too: Illinois Courts Ensure Access Much Shelist, P.C.
Apr
24
2012
Seventh Circuit Decision May Spur Limited Revival of HAMP Claims Against Loan Servicers Much Shelist, P.C.
Mar
18
2012
Contractual Non-Reliance Clauses: Insulating Defendants from Civil Fraud Claims Since 1995 Much Shelist, P.C.
May
24
2013
You Signed What?! Indemnification Provisions in Construction-Related Agreements Much Shelist, P.C.
Jun
30
2009
Ninth Circuit Rules on Copyright Act -- Attorney's Fees Clark & Trevithick
Aug
5
2009
Supreme Court Decision Impacts Federal Age Discrimination Claims Clark & Trevithick
Dec
14
2023
“Take Five” – A Guide to Invoking the Fifth Amendment in Civil Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
4
2010
The California Court Of Appeal Narrowly Interprets The Perata Mortgage Relief Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
14
2010
Three-Year Statute Of Limitations Applies To Inverse Condemnation Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
25
2011
Indirect Purchaser Plavix Class Actions Tossed for Lack of Antitrust Standing Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2011
Expanded Standing, or "Back to Basics"? Flash Memory Direct Purchasers Found to Have Standing to Assert Walker Process Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
9
2013
Line in the Sand: Siemens Argentina Case Limits Personal Jurisdiction Under the "FCPA" Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
3
2013
Transfer $8 Million Out Of Accounts In New York? That Action Alone Is Not Sufficient To Establish Personal Jurisdiction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
8
2013
Third and Seventh Circuit Courts of Appeals Issue TCPA Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
11
2014
I Scream, You Scream, We All Scream For…Ascertainability? Re: How Ben & Jerry’s Defeated an “All Natural” Class Certification Motion Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
2
2014
California Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Class Certification of Independent Contract Class Actions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
2
2014
Another Blow to Call Recording Class Actions in California Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
1
2016
Department of Justice Rule Increases False Claims Act Penalties to Over $20,000 Per Claim Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
31
2019
New Executive Orders Aim to Eliminate Unfair Surprise in Civil Enforcement Actions by Formalizing Guidance Documents Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
14
2020
California Court Sets High Bar For Class Certification In False Advertising Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
25
2022
California and Georgia Reach Settlement with Rent-to-Own Companies Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins