Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jun
30
2022
Divided Delaware Supreme Court Decision Highlights Issues About Director Independence in Derivative Actions Proskauer Rose LLP
Jan
10
2023
2023 Regulatory Forecast: Antitrust & Competition McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
5
2023
Second Circuit Confirms that Item 303 Disclosure Violations May Support Section 10(b) Liability in Reviving Claims Based on Failure to Disclose Risks from Harmful-Emission Regulation Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Sep
8
2023
New England Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Class Action Filings Soar in 2023 Pierce Atwood LLP
Jun
3
2024
“Unsworn” Attorney Affirmations: Overlooked Side Effect of Changes to CPLR 2106 Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jul
9
2014
European Account Preservation Orders: A New Method for Debt Recovery Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Oct
28
2015
UPDATE: Is Safe Harbor Still Safe? The European Court of Justice Answers with a Resounding “No” Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Dec
13
2018
Supreme Court to Reconsider “Auer Deference” Rule and Possibly Shrink Agency Leeway In Interpreting Regulations: Cracks in the Façade Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
30
2019
Kardashians Walk - Trademark Licensee Has No Standing To Sue For Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
21
2021
Supreme Court Update: City of Chicago v. Fulton (No. 19-357) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Apr
7
2022
Texas Drone Law Unconstitutional Robinson & Cole LLP
Sep
22
2022
Central Park Karen’s Discrimination Case Dismissed: Learning from Responding to Viral Videos Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Mar
18
2024
Eleventh Circuit Finds Volunteer Golf Attendants Not Entitled to Compensation Under the FLSA Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
29
2011
Taco Bell Owner Sued by EEOC for Religious Discrimination U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Dec
17
2013
Supreme Court Upholds Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Plan’s Three-Year Deadline to File a Lawsuit McDermott Will & Emery
May
15
2014
Ninth Circuit Upheld Tax Court's Determination that Litigation was not "Ascertainable with Reasonable Certainty" at the Time of Decedent's Death and so "Hazard of Litigation" Valuation Discount Did Not Apply Proskauer Rose LLP
Mar
16
2015
Law Degree No Longer a Prerequisite for Practicing Some Kinds of Law in Washington State The Rainmaker Institute
Jul
10
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 10, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
28
2015
Ohio Supreme Court Rules Class Cannot be Certified Without Actual Damages Under Ohio’s Consumer Sales Practice Act Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Mar
10
2016
In re Queen’s University at Kingston: Federal Circuit Recognizes Limited Patent Agent Privilege Hunton Andrews Kurth
Aug
11
2016
Financial Regulation: Narrowing Channel into Section 546(e)’s Safe Harbor? ArentFox Schiff LLP
May
23
2017
PTO Litigation Report – May 23, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
21
2018
What Investors Need to Know About the New $6.2 Billion Visa, Mastercard Settlement Katten
Aug
25
2021
ITC Section 337: Kiss of Death for PTAB Proceedings Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
23
2010
Preserving and Gathering Electronic Data in the Age of E-Discovery Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC
Oct
21
2012
Seventh Circuit Decision Holds that Taxes Paid by Illinois Hospitals Are Not Fully Reimbursable Under Medicare Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
2
2013
$6.6 Million in Sanctions Awarded to Defendants for an “Exceptional Case” Revoked Due to Admissions and Lack of Competing Evidence at Patent Trial McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
7
2014
MotivePower, Inc. v. Cutsforth, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00267 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins