Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Mar
17
2021
Can’t Camouflage Express Trademark Contract Terms McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
10
2021
Supreme Court Confirms Alaska Native Corporation Eligibility for CARES Act Relief Van Ness Feldman LLP
Oct
26
2021
Federal Circuit Clarifies that Willful Infringement Does Not Require Egregious Conduct Mintz
Aug
30
2022
Delaware Federal Court Quickly Denies Motion for a Preliminary Injunction Based Upon Alleged Data Incident Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
25
2023
Technology + Dispute Resolution Hotline: Fintechs To Be Covered Under Anti-Money Laundering Laws: Indian Court Directs a Cross Border Online Payment Gateway to Register as a Reporting Entity! Nishith Desai Associates
Feb
12
2013
Court Grants Summary Judgment for Non-Moving Party in Sales Representative Dispute Varnum LLP
Feb
28
2014
Former Lance Armstrong Endorsement of Supplement Company FRS Doesn’t Support False Advertising Class Action, California Federal Court Rules Greenberg Traurig, LLP
May
4
2015
California Supreme Court to Review On-Call Rest Breaks Jackson Lewis P.C.
Feb
25
2016
Force Majeure Clause Can’t Save a Company from its Own Bad Deal Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
28
2016
Federal Circuit Rejects ITC’s Authority over Intangible Articles McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
19
2017
The End of Union-Dictated Micro-Units: NLRB Overturns Specialty Healthcare Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
4
2019
FCRA Defendant Falls Victim of its Own Success, Gets Caught in Catch-22 of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
20
2019
Supreme Court Declines to Address the Question of Article III Standing to Appeal a Final Written Decision from the PTAB Mintz
Dec
30
2020
Arthrex’s Initial Merits Brief – Making the Case for Patent Judges as Principal Officers Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
4
2021
Whistleblowers Score Victory in Supreme Court Computer Access Case Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto
Mar
24
2022
Approval of US $237.5 Million Settlement in Boeing Derivative Action Demonstrates Impact of Section 220 Demand in ESG Litigation K&L Gates
Jul
18
2024
Eighth Circuit Chips Away at ‘Honest Belief’ Defense and Creates ‘Intertwinement Test’ for Disability Discrimination Cases Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Sep
30
2012
Public Comment: Word Counts But Kindergarten Fonts Hunton Andrews Kurth
Nov
28
2013
It's Official—The Supreme Court Announces That It Will Review The Contraceptive Mandate Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
27
2014
Georgia Federal Court Crushes Krush’s Motions for Preliminary Injunction on Patent Infringement and Trade Secret Misappropriation Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Dec
15
2015
Recent Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
5
2018
The 11th Circuit Weighs in on "Injury in Fact" - Taking Time to put a Credit Card Receipt in your Wallet and Later Dispose of it Creates Article III Standing Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
22
2020
Choice-of-Law Plan Provision Enforced As A Matter of Federal Common Law Proskauer Rose LLP
May
20
2024
EEOC Final Rule Implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Ignites Lawsuits from 19 States Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Aug
21
2013
Ninth Circuit Decides Plaintiff May Amend Complaint To Plead That Subsequent Event Caused Loss Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jul
1
2014
Apple Inc. v. Achates Reference Publishing, Inc.: The Duty to Indemnify Does Not Create Privity McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
21
2014
MotionPoint Corporation v. TransPerfect Global, Inc.: Decision on Motion to Stay CBM2014-00060 Faegre Drinker
Mar
7
2015
California Supreme Court Announces New Test for CEQA “Unusual Circumstances” Exception Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins