Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Aug
13
2019
PTAB Trial Practice Guide Update Codifies Recent PTAB Decisions and Procedure (Third and Last of a Series) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
2
2020
Unambiguous Repair Clause Bars Coverage for Yacht Fire Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
13
2020
No Reprieve: New Title IX Regulations Take Effect as Scheduled Faegre Drinker
Oct
25
2021
TCPAWorld After Death: Certified TCPA Class Action Lives On Despite Passing of Class Representative Troutman Amin, LLP
Mar
17
2023
Debts for a Partner’s Fraud Are Confirmed to be a Nondischargeable Debt According to the Supreme Court’s Opinion Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C.
May
21
2024
California Supreme Court Confirms the “Knowing and Intentional” Standard of California’s Wage Statement Law Requires a “Knowing and Intentional” Violation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
21
2013
Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction Over Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Citizen Suits Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Feb
26
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 26, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
30
2016
11th Circuit Holds Rule 23 Class Actions Can Proceed In Same Suit As FLSA Collective Actions Jackson Lewis P.C.
Mar
6
2018
February 2018 - Commercial and IP Development Update Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
12
2021
Employee Agreement of What “Shall Be” is Future Promise, Not Present Assignment McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
13
2023
Game Changer: States Unleash Legal Challenge Against NCAA’s Transfer Rule Jackson Lewis P.C.
Mar
5
2024
Recent Suit Filed in California Federal Court May Offer Glimpse Into Adjudicating RWI Disputes Hunton Andrews Kurth
Apr
21
2012
Another Case on Criminal Defendants Waiving Ineffective Assistance Claims Armstrong Teasdale
Feb
11
2013
Good News from the California Supreme on Mixed Motive Discrimination Cases . . . At Least For Now Greenberg Traurig, LLP
May
15
2013
What Goes Up…Must Come Down: Viagra Patent Invalidated by Canadian Supreme Court Faegre Drinker
Nov
27
2013
Exhaustion Applies to the Entire Patent, Not Specific Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
24
2014
Reloaded Games, Inc. v. Parallel Networks LLC: Denying Motion for Joinder and Denying Institution IPR2014-00950 Faegre Drinker
Oct
15
2015
Once Generic, Always Generic re: Jewelry Trademarks Katten
Jul
26
2016
False Ad Claims Fail to Crystalize as New Jersey Federal Court Dismisses Amended Complaint against Sharp Electronics with Prejudice Proskauer Rose LLP
May
5
2017
Ninth Circuit Weighs In On Employers’ Enigma: How to Balance Pay Equality and Reasonable Business Practices for Salary Determinations Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Dec
15
2017
The Bell Tolled — New York Court of Appeals Rules No Presumption on Facultative Liability Cap Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
3
2018
An Unlikely Pair: Two New Decisions Allow Consumers to Unilaterally Revoke Written TCPA Consent But for Vastly Different Reasons Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
26
2021
Mortgage Provider Obtains Dismissal of Data Privacy Class Action Litigation Concerning Two Data Breaches Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
7
2021
Illinois Prejudgment Interest – June Update Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Aug
28
2023
DOJ’s Suit Against SpaceX: The Perils of Conflating Export Control And I-9 Requirements Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
18
2024
Federal Circuit Provides Insight on Induced Infringement Claims in Amarin Pharma Inc. v. Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
18
2011
Supreme Court Rules That Knowledge Of Patent Is Required For Liability For Inducing Patent Infringement, But Willful Blindness Is Enough Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins