Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jan
17
2020
Court Rules Against Trustee’s Right to a Jury Trial Where the Trustee Agreed To A Summary Proceeding Winstead
Nov
12
2021
Beltway Buzz, November 12, 2021 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Nov
2
2023
Court Holds Pennsylvania's RGGI Rule Unconstitutional Babst, Calland, Clements & Zomnir, P.C.
Jun
10
2024
Federal Circuit Finds That a Narrowing Claim Limitation That Expressly Requires Optional Elements of a Markush Group from the Same Claim is Neither Contradictory nor Indefinite Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
28
2012
Patent Applicants Can Submit New Evidence to the District Court in Civil Actions Under §145 McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
15
2013
Male Successor’s Alleged Greater Ability to Negotiate over Salary Not a Defense to Equal Pay Act Claim Jackson Lewis P.C.
Nov
6
2014
D.C. Appeals Court Rejects Industry Challenge to OSHA’s Hazard Communication Rule Jackson Lewis P.C.
May
18
2015
ERISA Participant’s Supplemental Submission Doesn’t Restart Exhaustion Clock Proskauer Rose LLP
Mar
15
2017
When The Examiner Agrees With an Attorney’s Argument Presented in an Inter Partes Reexamination, But Cites to No Substantial Evidence, There is No Factual Basis for the Examiner’s Finding that Patent Claims are Unpatentable as Being Obvious Hunton Andrews Kurth
Dec
12
2018
The (Potential) Demise of Auer Deference? McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2019
“Good Genes?”: Maybe Not. FTC Takes Action Against Sunday Riley and Sunday Riley Modern Skincare, LLC For Employees False Reviews Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
30
2023
The Impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action Decision on Private Employers Polsinelli PC
Sep
18
2023
SEC Denial of Grayscale Bitcoin Fund Was Arbitrary and Capricious, Rules DC Circuit Court of Appeals Katten
Mar
25
2024
Hospitality Alert: Quick Facts on the Corporate Transparency Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
1
2011
Promens USA Pays $225,000 To Settle EEOC Lawsuit U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Sep
4
2014
Wintek Corp. v. TPK Touch Solutions: Order Regarding Deposition Costs IPR2013-00567, IPR2013-00568, IPR2014-0054 Faegre Drinker
Mar
9
2016
U.S. Supreme Court Declines Review of Matter Involving Student Discipline von Briesen & Roper, s.c.
Jan
12
2017
Intellectual Property Cases to Watch in 2017 Mintz
Mar
26
2018
Transgender, Transitioning, and Title VII: Sixth Circuit Provides Protected Status Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
May
14
2020
Employers Beware: COVID-19–Related Employment Lawsuits Are Heating Up Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Aug
26
2020
Major South Carolina Appellate Decision on Property Tax Exemption Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Apr
11
2023
Hidden Camera Lawsuits Buckfire Law
Feb
19
2010
Insurer Required to Defend Directors and Officers Against Ponzi Claims (Pendergest-Holt v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London) Goldberg Segalla LLP
Jun
1
2013
Total Settles Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) Bribery Claims for $398M Katten
Jul
10
2014
Ohio Judge: Mortgage Underwriters Properly Classified As Exempt Administrative Employees Jackson Lewis P.C.
Oct
28
2015
Facebook: Second Circuit "Likes" Employee Rights Under the NLRA Murtha Cullina
Dec
24
2015
Massachusetts Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated Patent Ethics Decision Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Aug
11
2016
How Far Is Too Far? New York Clarifies Potential Warnings Liability for Third-Party Products Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins