Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Dec
19
2014
Apple Inc. v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and Dynamic Advances, LLC, Denying Second Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00319 Faegre Drinker
Oct
17
2015
The Internet of Things and the Inevitable Collision with Product Liability PART 4: Government Oversight Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Dec
17
2015
Burn Injuries: Statistics, Classifications, & Causes Stark & Stark
May
2
2016
Federal Circuit Reverses Claim Construction of Design Patent That Ignored Functional Elements Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
May
10
2017
Illinois Employers Beware: Slope of Negligent Supervision and Retention Claims May Have Just Become More Slippery Much Shelist, P.C.
Dec
21
2017
EPA Reverses Position on NSR Enforcement Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Mar
16
2021
Two Is Not Always Better Than One – Court Dismisses TCPA Class Action Under First-to-File Doctrine Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
2
2021
The End of The Mcgahn Litigation Saga: House Subpoena Power Is Vindicated, for Now K&L Gates
Mar
17
2022
Hypothetical Device Doesn’t Meet Domestic Industry Requirement McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
5
2023
Sixth Circuit Rules that Brandished Firearm Could Be 'Threat of Violence' Infringing on Constitutionally-Protected Free Speech Miller Canfield
May
13
2024
NEW Frequently Asked Questions About EPA’s Expansive PFAS Reporting Rule Under the Toxic Substances Control Act Hunton Andrews Kurth
Feb
15
2013
Federal Court Reaffirms that Motions to Dismiss Must Be Based on Information Expressly Included in the Complaint Varnum LLP
Dec
3
2013
2013 Year-End Estate Planning and Review Much Shelist, P.C.
Jul
2
2014
Postscript: In Supreme Court Title Fight, "Raging Bull" Heir Knocks Out Laches Defense Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
24
2015
New Jersey Supreme Court Addresses Criminal Liability of Whistleblowers Jackson Lewis P.C.
Mar
3
2017
An Easier Path: McCarrell v. Hoffman-La Roche Paves the Way to Bring Tort Claims in New Jersey Barred by Other States’ Statutes of Limitations K&L Gates
Oct
4
2017
Abeyance on H-4 EAD Lawsuit Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Oct
16
2020
McDermottPlus Check-Up: October 16, 2020 McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
28
2020
Can’t Hold Macklemore and Ryan Lewis Liable for Copyright Infringement Says Fifth Circuit Stark & Stark
May
26
2021
Trial & Error: Violation of MIL Order Not a Per Se Justification for New Trial Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
13
2022
Supreme Court Blocks OSHA Vaccine-or-Test Mandate Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
2
2023
Are Highly Paid Daily Rate Workers Entitled to Overtime Under FLSA? Supreme Court Resolves Issue Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Feb
26
2024
Court Affirmed Award of Damages Against Trustee Due to Breach of Duty to Disclose, Held that Trust was Terminated and Disclaimer was Effective, and Affirmed Award of Attorney’s Fees Against Trustee and Refusal to Allow Trustee to Reimburse Herself Winstead
Sep
6
2019
California Supreme Court Applies Notice-Prejudice Rule to Violation of First-Party Consent Provision as a Predicate to Policy Forfeiture, but Confirms that No Prejudice is Required to Enforce a Third-Party “No Voluntary Payments” Provision Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
29
2020
No Statutory Damages Even When Post-Registration Acts Violate a Different Exclusive Right from Pre-Registration Acts McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2012
§ 301(a) of Copyright Act Creates Complete Preemption McDermott Will & Emery
May
6
2014
Taking Hospital Employees Down from their Pedestals: Why Title VII Religious Discrimination Should Not Be Applicable for Immunizations Florida International University College of Law
Jan
4
2017
New York Federal Court Dismisses Muslim Employee’s Failure to Accommodate Suit Jackson Lewis P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins