Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jun
4
2024
The Importance of Counsel’s Involvement in Discovery Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Nov
12
2011
Court of Justice of the European Union Provides Further Guidance on Circumstances in which Keyword Advertising Constitutes Trademark Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
12
2012
Hail To The Chief: In The Interest of E.R. Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jan
20
2014
Should a Non-Compete be Signed Before or After Employment Begins? Answer: It Depends in Alabama and Elsewhere Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jun
5
2014
Wary of Class Action Abuses, Seventh Circuit Slams ‘Scandalous’ Settlement Over Allegedly Defective Windows Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Mar
29
2015
Creative Interpretation of Abandonment Cannot Save Patent: Hyundai Motor Co. v. American Vehicular Sciences LLC McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
16
2015
Do You Have A Duty To Cross The Rubicon? re: North Carolina Real Estate Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
14
2016
European Court Of Justice Requires European Commission To Provide Adequate Reasons For Its Requests For Information McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
8
2017
Taking flight: taxation on receivership Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
20
2019
Questions Regarding Cy Pres Settlements Remain after Frank v. Gaos Pierce Atwood LLP
Nov
10
2021
Lloyd Court Says No to Class Action-Style Lawsuits in the UK Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jun
30
2022
Supreme Court Limits EPA's Authority to Regulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Van Ness Feldman LLP
Apr
6
2023
Fording Viking River, Another California Court of Appeal Holds That PAGA Plaintiffs Maintain Standing to Pursue “Representative” Claims Even if Compelled to Arbitrate “Individual” Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
19
2024
Food Industry Group Files Brief in Support of GMO Labeling Rule Keller and Heckman LLP
Dec
20
2010
When the Toyota Way Went Wrong Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. (RIMS)
Oct
4
2013
Freedom of Use of Copyrighted Court Documents McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
31
2014
U.S. Supreme Court Creates Uniform Test for Standing in False Advertising Cases Vedder Price
Sep
26
2014
Planning for Successful Mergers and Acquisitions Requires Expert Guidance McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
Mar
31
2016
Unified Patents v. BlitzSafe Texas: To Redact Entire Exhibit Board Expects Specific Discussion Of Why Each Subpart Is Confidential IPR2016-00118 Faegre Drinker
Jun
13
2017
PTO Litigation Report – June 13, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
21
2017
DTSA and Ex Parte Seizure – Lessons From The First Ex Parte Seizure Under The DTSA Mintz
Dec
20
2018
How About That? TCPA Class Action Dismissed as Text Promoting Defendant’s App Was Transactional Message–Express Written Consent Not Required Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
12
2020
Business, Interrupted Stark & Stark
Apr
7
2022
Tales From the Bench: A Conversation With Joe Cox [PODCAST] Bracewell LLP
Jan
12
2023
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases Second Batch of Typical Civil Code Cases Including Piercing the Corporate Veil in a Trademark/Unfair Competition Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
4
2013
U.S. Supreme Court Decides Important Development Permitting Case, Extending Regulatory Takings Analysis Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
24
2014
Summary Judgment for Insurer Was Proper as it Had Cancelled Policy Several Months Prior to the Accident for Non-Payment of Premiums Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C.
Jan
30
2015
Intellectual Property: Firm Disqualified Because Preliminary Injunction Is “Directly Adverse” to Another Client McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins