Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Oct
10
2022
AutoZone May Not Have “Provided” Suitable Seating To Employees Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
7
2023
END OF AN ERA: Massive Decade-Long TCPA MDL Against Portfolio Recovery Services Comes to A Close And It Is a Good Opportunity to Reflect Troutman Amin, LLP
Nov
19
2009
Ohio Supreme Court Allows Coverage for Negligent Supervision Claims Related to Intentional Acts Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
May
14
2014
Does the Consumer Protection Safety Commission (CPSC) Have the Authority to Sue Corporate Executives in a Product Recall? The Question Remains Unanswered. Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
13
2015
Minnesota Supreme Court Allows Advice of Counsel Defense to Tortious Interference Claim in Non-Compete Dispute Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jul
9
2015
Sharp Corporation v. Surpass Tech Innovation: Denying Request for Rehearing Where a Drafting Error Within a Claim is Not Shown IPR2015-00021 Faegre Drinker
May
19
2017
More On Revlon Duties In California Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Nov
8
2018
PTAB Boardside Chat Provides Further Details About New Amendment Procedure Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
5
2019
False Claims Act Whistleblower Prevails in First Circuit Appeal Zuckerman Law
Jul
12
2019
A Rock And A Hard Place: Court Denies TCPA Defendant Post-Certification Leave To Add Bristol-Myers Squibb Affirmative Defense Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
2
2020
USCIS Fee Increase Blocked by California Federal Judge Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Jul
13
2022
SCOTUS Declines to Answer Calls for Clarification in American Axle v. Neapco Mintz
Apr
19
2023
Virginia Passes Legislation Prohibiting the Use of Employees’ Social Security Numbers as Identifiers Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jan
8
2024
Case Still Dismissed!: Plaintiff Joseph Nelums’ Motion For Reconsideration Denied Troutman Amin, LLP
Mar
12
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 12, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
27
2014
J.M. Smucker Company Gets Out of a Jam in Food Labelling Case - Caldera v. The J.M. Smucker Co. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
18
2015
Pro-enforcement Noncompete Decision from Wisconsin Supreme Court Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
11
2016
Two Recent Federal Court Decisions Explore the Limits of the At-Will Employment Doctrine Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
13
2017
“100% Healed From Injury” Policies May Violate CA Fair Employment and Housing Act Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
21
2017
Murphy Oil Case Scheduled for Oral Argument Jackson Lewis P.C.
Aug
1
2018
Second Circuit Finds Commercial Crime Coverage For $4.8M Email Spoofing Loss Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
Jun
12
2020
Federal Court Finds Cybersecurity Forensic Report Not Privileged Under Attorney Work Product Doctrine Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
29
2020
Cryptoasset update: FCA report shows increased usage as HM Treasury consults on expanded financial promotions requirements Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
21
2022
Court Rejects Use of Eminent Domain for Recreational Trail Roetzel & Andress LPA
Sep
14
2023
Texas District Court Overturns Portions of the IDR Process McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
18
2012
To Post or Not to Post – Are All Employee Facebook Comments Protected Under the NLRA? Bracewell LLP
Jun
6
2013
California’s Future Uncertain as U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Postpones Oil and Gas Lease Auctions Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Dec
12
2013
United States Supreme Court Holds that Contractual Forum-Selection Clauses Deserve Near Absolute Deference In Considering Changes of Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins