Litigation, ADR Arbitration, E-Discovery, Franchising, Injury, Liability, & Malpractice Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Aug
12
2012
House Subcommittee Weighs CAFA Successes and Opportunities Seven Years after the Legislation’s Enactment Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jul
24
2013
U.S. Supreme Court Decision on Same-Sex Marriage Has Significant Impact on Benefit Plans Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Oct
5
2014
A Warehouse Full of Unapproved Genetically-Modified Seeds; Now What?, Syngenta Seeds, Inc. v. Bunge North America, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
28
2016
Courts Continue To Require That TCPA Classes Be Presently and Readily Ascertainable By Reference To Objective Criteria Faegre Drinker
Jun
23
2017
Negotiating Tips: The Art of the Ratification Bonus Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
3
2020
No “Pretext” Here: One-page Fax Invite To Free Webinar Not An Unsolicited Advertisement Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
26
2018
First-In-the-Nation-Result: District Court Stays TCPA Case Pending Outcome of Ninth Circuit First Amendment Challenge Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
31
2019
“Good Genes?”: Maybe Not. FTC Takes Action Against Sunday Riley and Sunday Riley Modern Skincare, LLC For Employees False Reviews Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
9
2021
California Jury Awards Employees $7.6 Million in Latest Gargantuan Wrongful Termination Verdict Proskauer Rose LLP
May
6
2022
Is It Time to Update Mass. R. Civ. P. 23? Pierce Atwood LLP
Apr
28
2023
Slowing the Spread of Litigation: An Update on First Circuit COVID-19 Tuition Refund Class Actions Pierce Atwood LLP
Apr
21
2013
Gun Bill Pulled from the Senate MapLight
Feb
3
2014
Toxic Tort Cases and TLV - Threshold Limit Value Armstrong Teasdale
Aug
4
2014
Veeam Software Corporation v. Symantec Corporation, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00150 Faegre Drinker
Jun
19
2015
Dealing with Product Liability Down Under Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Sep
29
2015
Illinois Appellate Court Reinforces that Physician Contracts Help Protect Against Vicarious Liability Claims Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C.
Apr
17
2017
The Heavy Burden of Light Duty in California: Court Assesses Multi-Million Dollar Disability Award Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Apr
10
2020
Creation of Fake Online Accounts to Study Algorithmic Bias Does Not Violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, D.C. Court Rules Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
18
2018
New York State Court Declines to Compel Arbitration, Cites Purported Ambiguities in Mobile Contracting Process Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
5
2021
New Advisory Opinion on ASCs: New Flexibilities (Or Not?) Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
16
2022
Australian High Court Upholds Examination Rights of Eligible Applicants Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
28
2024
U.S. Supreme Court Rules SEC Must Try Securities Fraud Cases in Federal Jury Trials Rather than In-House Courts Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
28
2013
Iowa Supreme Court Strikes “Exposure Estimate” Testimony in Pesticide Suit Beveridge & Diamond PC
Jun
19
2014
Why Biolase v. Oracle Partners, L.P. May Not Be The Last Word On Director Resignations Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Feb
13
2015
Another Court Rejects Notion that Restrictive Covenant Agreements Must be Supported by At Least Two Years of At-Will Employment Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
Apr
11
2015
Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, Granting patent owner’s motion to compel testimony IPR2014-00553 Faegre Drinker
Aug
4
2015
Be Very Careful If You Are Instructing Your Clients Not To Answer Questions At A Deposition Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP
Mar
26
2019
What the Supreme Court's Cougar Den Decision Means Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins