Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Custom text Organization
Jun
11
2014
Motorola Mobility LLC, Google Inc., and Apple Inc. v. Arendi S.A.R.L.: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Jun
11
2014
Dollar Tree's "Scrub Buddies" Cleaning Cloths Targeted for Alleged Design Patent Infringement Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
11
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 11, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
11
2014
UK High Court Confirms Jurisdiction to Grant Cross-border Declaration of Non-infringement Mintz
Jun
11
2014
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Order Regarding Proposed Challenge to Scope of Reply IPR2013-00368, 371, 372 Faegre Drinker
Jun
10
2014
Hershey Is Not So Sweet on Maryland Senator’s HERSHEY Campaign Logo Mintz
Jun
10
2014
Square, Inc. v. J. Carl Cooper, Order Denying Authorization to Oppose Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00156 Faegre Drinker
Jun
10
2014
Patent Co-Owner’s Refusal to Join Suit Defeats Standing to Sue for Patent Infringement Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
10
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 10, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
9
2014
Square, Inc. v. J. Carl Cooper: Order Denying Request for Rehearing of Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Jun
9
2014
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Grants in Part Request for Rehearing of its Decision on Live Testimony from Inventor Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
9
2014
Microsoft Corp. v. SurfCast, Inc. Order Granting Additional Briefing IPR2013-00292 Faegre Drinker
Jun
9
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 9, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
9
2014
Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Personal Audio, LLC, Decision: Denying Request for Reconsideration of Institution Decision IPR2014-00070 Faegre Drinker
Jun
9
2014
Federal Circuit Finds that Public Interest Group Lacks Standing to Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decision Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
8
2014
How Should a Petitioner Address the Technological Invention Exemption in a Petition for Covered Business Method Review? Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
8
2014
What’s My Motivation? To Successfully Petition the PTAB, Experts Should Articulate Reasons for Combining References Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
7
2014
The U.S. Supreme Court Rules On Induced Infringement Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
6
2014
Providing Expert Testimony On Obviousness Is No Guarantee Of Having A Petition Granted Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
6
2014
Apple, Inc. v. Evolutionary Intelligence, Inc., Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery Faegre Drinker
Jun
6
2014
Supreme Court Delivers Unanimous Decisions in Two Important Patent Cases: What Do This Week’s Limelight and Nautilus Decisions Mean for You? Mintz
Jun
6
2014
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Statistics (2013 vs. May 2014) Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
6
2014
Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects Federal Circuit Standards for Indefiniteness and Induced Infringement Katten
Jun
6
2014
Mastercard International Incorporated v. John D’Agostino: Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion to Stay Reexamination Faegre Drinker
Jun
6
2014
Limelight Networks: There Has To Be A Bad Guy Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
6
2014
PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) Delays Multiple CBM (Covered Business Method) Review Cases to Await SCOTUS Opinion in CLS Bank Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
6
2014
U.S. Supreme Court Makes It Easier to Knock Out Patents For Indefiniteness in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc. Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Jun
6
2014
Denying Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing on Decision on Institutions: Conopco, Inc. dba Unilever v. The Procter & Gamble Company Faegre Drinker
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters.

 

Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters