Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Dec
18
2013
Advocate General Jääskinen Gives Georgetown University SPC (Supplementary Protection Certificate) Opinion McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
18
2013
Court of Appeal Recasts Guidance on Granting Stays in Patent Proceedings While European Patent Office Proceedings Are Pending McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
17
2013
The Top Ten Things You Should Know About The Innovation Act of 2013 (For Now) Hunton Andrews Kurth
Dec
17
2013
Creditors’ Rights Clarified By Interpretation II of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of the People’s Republic of China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
17
2013
Actions Under § 337 Based on Inducement Require Existence of Direct Infringement Prior to Importation McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
16
2013
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Amendments to Premerger Notification Rules: The Who, What & Why Faegre Drinker
Dec
16
2013
Top Ten Intellectual Property Stories from 2013
Dec
16
2013
U.S. House of Representatives Passes Patent Reform Bill; Senate Considers Its Own Legislation Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
16
2013
Australian High Court Confirms That Methods Of Medical Treatment of the Human Body Are Patentable Inventions Mintz
Dec
16
2013
Court of Appeal Confirms High Court Decision and Finds no Copyright Infringement in Software With Same Functionality McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
13
2013
Joint Motions to Terminate Patent Reviews Late in Trial Proceedings Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
13
2013
Ninth Circuit Rejects Claims for Contributory Cybersquatting Under the ACPA (Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act) Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Dec
12
2013
Paging Mr. Charbucks… Re: Trademark Infringement Dickinson Wright PLLC
Dec
12
2013
Michelle Lee Becomes (Acting) Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property
Dec
12
2013
Supreme Court takes up CLS Bank v. Alice – Clarification or More Obfuscation To Come? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
10
2013
Divisional Practice in the BRICs and other Countries – Part 4 of a 9-Part Series Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
9
2013
Willful Infringement of Copyright in Haitian Earthquake Photographs Cost AFP (Agence France-Presse) and Getty $1.2 Million Mintz
Dec
9
2013
Supreme Court to Consider Case on Patent Eligibility of Computer-Implemented Inventions Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
6
2013
$2.3 Million Trial Verdict Against Newegg Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
6
2013
Australia – High Court Decision on Methods of Medical Treatment
Dec
5
2013
Corralling Non Practicing Entities: Washington's Pending Patent Reform Bills Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
Dec
4
2013
To Search or Not to Search? Re: Patent Applications Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Dec
4
2013
SCOTUS Grants Certiorari in Case Which Acknowledged Confusion Over Timeliness Requirement for Filing a Copyright Infringement Claim Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.
Dec
2
2013
Kraft v. Cracker Barrel: A Summary of Judge Posner’s Opinion and an Alternative Reverse Confusion Theory of Liability Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
2
2013
Divisional Practice in the BRICs and other Countries – Part 3 of a 9-Part Series Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
2
2013
The Unacknowledged Role of Section 112 in the Myriad Decisions Re: Patent Eligibility of Genomic DNA
Nov
29
2013
Inequitable Conduct Still Has Bite After Therasense McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
29
2013
Rule 36 Judgment Does Not Endorse or Reject Any Specific Part of the Trial Court Reasoning McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins