Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jul
24
2014
The Thorny Problem of Patentable Eligible Subject Matter: Part 5 of a 10-Part Series: Brazil Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
23
2014
Apotex Inc. v. Wyeth LLC, Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00115 Faegre Drinker
Jul
23
2014
ScentAir Technologies, Inc. v. Prolitec, Inc., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00180 Faegre Drinker
Jul
23
2014
Sequenom, Inc. v. The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00337 Faegre Drinker
Jul
23
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 23, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
22
2014
Emerging Markets: Opportunity, Risk, and What it Means for Brand Protection [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
22
2014
Netflix, Inc. v. OpenTV, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00252 Faegre Drinker
Jul
22
2014
Symantec Corporation v. RPost Communications Limited, Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00353 Faegre Drinker
Jul
22
2014
What Trademark Filing Trends Reveal About Expected Brand Growth – and What it Means for Your Global Brand Protection Strategy Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
22
2014
Google Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. v. CreateAds LLC, Decision Regarding Standard for Claim Construction IPR2014-00200 Faegre Drinker
Jul
22
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 22, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
22
2014
International Securities Exchange, LLC v. Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated, Decision Granting Additional Discovery IPR2014-00097, 98 Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2014
Toshiba Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision Not To Institute IPR2014-00317 Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2014
Iron Dome LLC v. E-Watch, Inc., Expunging Unauthorized Motion to Exclude and Reply to Preliminary Response IPR2014-00439 Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2014
Advantages of Filing More Than One IPR (Inter Partes Review) Against A Single Patent Armstrong Teasdale
Jul
21
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 21, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
18
2014
Nuvasive, Inc. v. Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc., Final Written Decision (FWD) Faegre Drinker
Jul
18
2014
Derivation Proceedings: What You Need to Know [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
18
2014
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Technology LLC, Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Claims 1-26 of the ’672 Patent Faegre Drinker
Jul
18
2014
Naughty Dog, Inc. v. McRO, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision Denying Institution Faegre Drinker
Jul
18
2014
Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. v. RPost Communications Ltd. – PTAB Finds Electronic Messaging a “Technological Invention” Outside Ambit of Covered Business Method Review Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
18
2014
Toshiba Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC, Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision Denying Institution Faegre Drinker
Jul
18
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 18, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
18
2014
Digitech Image Technologies, LLC v. Electronics For Imaging, Inc. — Data Structures Per Se Not Patentable Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
18
2014
Netflix, Inc. v. OpenTV, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing on Decision on Institution Faegre Drinker
Jul
17
2014
VMware, Inc. v. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Order Regarding Non-Compliant Petition Faegre Drinker
Jul
17
2014
SAP America, Inc. v. Versata Development Group, Inc., Granting Motion for Additional Briefing on Alice v. CLS Bank Faegre Drinker
Jul
17
2014
Corning Incorporated v. DSM IP Assets B.V., Denying Request for Rehearing of Final Written Decision (FWD) Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins