Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jul
30
2014
Zetec, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Co.: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Jul
30
2014
Unified Patents, Inc. v. Personal Web Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC, Denying Motion for Joinder Faegre Drinker
Jul
30
2014
Bushwacker Accused of Serial Patent Infringement of Hood Protectors Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
30
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 30, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
30
2014
The Race is on! Anxiously Waiting for the First U.S. Biosimilar to Cross the Finish Line Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
30
2014
Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems, Inc: Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Jul
30
2014
Trade Secrets Legislation Introduced in the House of Representatives Covington & Burling LLP
Jul
30
2014
Lenroc Company v. Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc., Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00382 Faegre Drinker
Jul
29
2014
Granting Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00746, Arris Group, Inc. v. C-Cation Technologies, LLC Faegre Drinker
Jul
29
2014
Westlake Services, LLC d/b/a Westlake Financial Services v. Credit Acceptance Corp.: Denying Authorization to File Motion for Additional Discovery CBM2014-00008 Faegre Drinker
Jul
29
2014
Inter Partes Review Appeals: What You Need to Know [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
29
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 29, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
29
2014
eBay Enterprises, Inc. and eBay Inc. v. Lawrence B. Lockwood: Denying Motion to Compel Cross-Examination CBM2014-00025 Faegre Drinker
Jul
28
2014
Schott Gemtron Corporation v. SSW Holding Company, Inc., Granting Motion for Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00367 Faegre Drinker
Jul
28
2014
Rackspace US, Inc. and Rackspace Hosting, Inc. v. Personal Web Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, Decision on Patent Owner’s Motion to Stay IPR2014-00057 Faegre Drinker
Jul
28
2014
GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc., Decision on Petitioner’s Request for Declaration IPR2014-00041, 43, 51, 54, 55 Faegre Drinker
Jul
28
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 28, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
25
2014
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company v. Monsanto Technology LLC, Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00335 Faegre Drinker
Jul
25
2014
Microsoft Corporation v. VirnetX Inc., Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00401 Faegre Drinker
Jul
25
2014
Cyanotech Corporation v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Granting Leave to File Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2013-00401, 404 Faegre Drinker
Jul
25
2014
CAFC Orders District Court to Stay Proceedings Pending CBM Review, Criticizes District Court’s “Review” of PTAB’s Decision to Institute CBM Trial Armstrong Teasdale
Jul
25
2014
Motorola Mobility LLC v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, Denying Leave to File Additional Briefing Regarding Updated Mandatory Notice IPR2014-00504 Faegre Drinker
Jul
25
2014
The American Invents Act Has Moved the Cheese [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
25
2014
Spectra Logic Corporation v. Overland Storage Inc., Granting Sua Sponte Motion to Exclude Demonstrative Exhibit IPR2013-00357 Faegre Drinker
Jul
25
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 25, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
24
2014
FDA Accepts the First Biosimilar Application under the BPCIA (Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act) Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
24
2014
Trending Information: The Connection Between Data Brokers and the Fashion Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
24
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 24, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins