Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Aug
2
2014
No “Plausible Basis” to Establish Federal Circuit Jurisdiction in Transfer From Eleventh Circuit: Krauser v. Biohorizons, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
2
2014
An Expensive Reminder to Secure Trademark Rights Prior to Foreign Expansion Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
1
2014
Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Enforce Patent When Co-Owner Refuses to Participate in Litigation: STC.UNM v. Intel Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
1
2014
Convenience Trumps Potentially Higher Royalties McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
1
2014
Vibrant Media, Incorporated v. General Electric Company, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00172 Faegre Drinker
Aug
1
2014
Identifying Class of Algorithms Insufficient To Satisfy Means-Plus-Function Structure Requirement: Triton Tech of Texas, LLC v. Nintendo of America, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
1
2014
On a Plain and Ordinary Meaning of “Embedded” Code in a Web Page: Augme Techs., Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2014
The United States Postal Service v. Return Mail, Inc.: Authorizing Reply and Sur-Reply Faegre Drinker
Jul
31
2014
Don’t Expect a Drop-Off in Patent Litigation Bilzin Sumberg
Jul
31
2014
Lie Still: Claim Construction on Hospital Bed Unduly Limited McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2014
GDC Seeks to Dock Alumadock for Going Off the Deep End and Committing Patent Infringement Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
31
2014
Pre-suit Claim Construction Analysis Must Satisfy Rule 11 McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2014
USPTO TRIPs Over Myriad-Mayo Guidance - Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
Jul
31
2014
Contractual Duty to Deal Does Not Equal Antitrust Duty to Deal McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2014
Athena Automation Ltd. v. Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00167 Faegre Drinker
Jul
31
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 31, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
31
2014
Examiner and Board Must Be Consistent in Prior Art-Based Rejections of Similarly-Worded Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2014
Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Limited, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00128 Faegre Drinker
Jul
31
2014
Voluntary and Intentional Applicant Choices are Errors Under the Reissue Statute Only if They Arises from a False or Deficient Understanding of Fact or Law McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2014
A Compound Is Obvious Where Only Minor Changes to a Prior Art “Lead Compound” Are Required to Make the Claimed Compound McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2014
Obviousness Only Requires Reasonable Expectation of Success of One Compound Encompassed by Broad Genus Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2014
The Federal Circuit Reverse a Finding of Anticipation of the PTAB in Inter Partes Review McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2014
Statutory Right to Appeal Does Not Bypass Article III Standing Requirements McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2014
Federal Circuit Orders Stay Pending Completion of CBM Review: VirtualAgility, Inc. v. Salesforce.com, Inc. et al. McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2014
Focal Therapeutics, Inc. v. Senorx, Inc.: Guidance on Conferring with a Witness Between Cross-Examination and Re-Cross Faegre Drinker
Jul
30
2014
USPTO Defends Constitutionality of Inter Partes Review Armstrong Teasdale
Jul
30
2014
Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International et al.: Supreme Court on Evaluation of Claims to Computer-Implemented Inventions under 35 U.S.C. § 101 McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2014
MotionPoint Corporation v. Transperfect Global, Inc.: Denying Institution of Covered Business Methods Review Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins