Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Nov
5
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 5, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
5
2014
FedEx Corporation v. IpVenture, Inc.: Granting Second Motion to Correct Clerical Error in Petition IPR2014-00833 Faegre Drinker
Nov
5
2014
Baxter Healthcare Corp., Apatech v. Millenium Biologix: Denying Request for Rehearing the Order that Petitioner’s Reply Evidence will not be Considered IPR2013-00582, 590 Faegre Drinker
Nov
4
2014
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Depositions: Civility and Decorum Must Prevail McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
4
2014
PTAB Denies Petitioner’s Second Bite at the Apple Armstrong Teasdale
Nov
4
2014
Alice: It’s No Use Going Back to Yesterday Because I Was a Different [Patent] Then Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Nov
4
2014
International Business Machines Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00681 Faegre Drinker
Nov
4
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 4, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
4
2014
Case Digest: Weber-Stephen Products LLC v. Sears Holding Corporation Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
4
2014
The Era of Generic Biologic Drugs Has Officially Begun: An Update on U.S. Biosimilars [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
4
2014
E*Trade, Scottrade, TD Ameritrade v. Droplets, Inc.: Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Faegre Drinker
Nov
4
2014
PTAB Adopts Broad View of Inherency Doctrine McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
3
2014
Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00288 Faegre Drinker
Nov
3
2014
Canadian Hospital To Travel The Long And Winding Road Of “Gene Patenting”
Nov
3
2014
Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer, Inc. v. Bonutti Skeletal Innovations LLC: Denying Institution and Joinder IPR2014-01078 Faegre Drinker
Nov
3
2014
New European Unity Rules in Effect November 1, 2014 Mintz
Nov
3
2014
PTAB Clarifies Permissible Use of Documents and Evidence McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
3
2014
IPR Clock Runs Until Allegations Are Nullified McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
3
2014
Oracle, YP Interactive, and Yellowpages.com v. Click-to-Call Technologies LP, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00312 Faegre Drinker
Nov
3
2014
PTAB Denies Motion to Amend for Failure to Show Patentability McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
3
2014
FedEx Corporation v. IpVenture, Inc., Denying Motion to Correct Clerical Mistake IPR2014-00833 Faegre Drinker
Nov
2
2014
PTAB Does Not Rely on District Court’s Markman Decision in Construing Claim Terms McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
2
2014
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Sustains Opposition on the Basis of Fraud McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
2
2014
Wireless Seismic, Inc. v Fairfield Industries, Inc., Denying Leave to File Supplemental Information IPR2014-01113 Faegre Drinker
Nov
2
2014
Specificity and Negotiation Are the Buzz Words for IPR Discovery McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
2
2014
Specificity Key in IPR Petitions McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
2
2014
A Hypothetical-License Damages Theory Must Be Rooted in Non-Hypothetical Evidence McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
2
2014
Choose Your Battles Before the PTAB – 49 Basis Is Just Too Many! McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins