Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Mar
27
2015
Luck Runs Out for Lucky Brand: Marcel Fashions Group, Inc. v. Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2015
No Lanham Act Standing Without U.S. Trademark Use or Registration: Belmora LLC v. Bayer Consumer Care AG McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2015
Bob Marley’s Heirs Lanham Act Win Upheld McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
26
2015
Copyright Co-Owner’s Ability to Grant an Exclusive Right to a Third Party: Corbello v. DeVito McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
26
2015
No Acquiescence Defense in Fifth Circuit Without Significant Investment in Reliance: Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. Miller Oil & Gas Operations McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
26
2015
Reasonable Royalty Damages in Copyright: Gaylord v. United States McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
26
2015
Chuck Yeager’s Latest Suit Pulls Out of Nose Dive: Yeager et al. v. Fort Knox Security Products McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
26
2015
Protecting Trade Secrets Insufficient to Enforce Covenant Not to Compete in Any Capacity Worldwide McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
26
2015
Licensees Not Required to Do Due Diligence Where Inventor Falsely Claimed Exclusive Ownership McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
26
2015
Supreme Court Decision Underscores the Importance of TTAB Cases Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
26
2015
Purdue Pharma L.P v. Depomed, Inc: Granting in part Motion to Seal IPR2014-00377, 378, 379 Faegre Drinker
Mar
26
2015
UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) Launches Article 101 Investigation Into Fashion Markets Covington & Burling LLP
Mar
26
2015
Focus on Patent Quality re: USPTO Enhanced Quality Initiative Covington & Burling LLP
Mar
26
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 26, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
26
2015
HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. v. Flashpoint Technology, Inc: Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-01249 Faegre Drinker
Mar
26
2015
Patent Term Adjustment In The Post-RCE Period -- Request for Continued Examination Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
26
2015
Nintendo of America, Inc. and Nintendo Co., Ltd. v. Babbage Holdings, LLC: Granting Motion for Joinder IPR2015-00568 Faegre Drinker
Mar
26
2015
Cloud Storage Company Grounded in District of Massachusetts Proskauer Rose LLP
Mar
26
2015
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Constellation Technologies LLC: Denying Institution IPR2014-01179 Faegre Drinker
Mar
26
2015
Supreme Court to Hear Argument on March 31 Whether to Overrule Brulotte v. Thys, Co. Mintz
Mar
26
2015
Supreme Court Rules That TTAB Decisions Can Have Preclusive Effect in Infringement Actions Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Mar
25
2015
Supreme Court Holds that Courts Should Give Issue Preclusive Effect to Trademark Trial Appeal Board Decisions Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
25
2015
Did Teva Alter the Standard for Invalidating a Patent for Indefiniteness? Dickinson Wright PLLC
Mar
25
2015
Supreme Court Gives TTAB Decisions Preclusive Effect Over Federal Court Infringement Actions in Limited Circumstances Katten
Mar
25
2015
Teva Pharmaceuticals: Is It Time to Rethink How You Will Argue Claim Construction? Dickinson Wright PLLC
Mar
25
2015
Mobotix Corp. v. e-Watch, Inc., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00499 Faegre Drinker
Mar
25
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 25, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
25
2015
Federal Circuit Finds Disclaimer Based on “Object of Invention” Language Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins